Omnipredictors（Gopalan，Kalai，Reingold，Sharan和Wieder ITCS 2021）的概念提出了一种新的损失最小化范式。与损失损失$ c $相比，无需基于已知的损失功能学习预测指标，而是可以轻松地进行后处理以最大程度地减少任何丰富的损失功能家族。已经表明，这种杂手已经存在，并暗示（对于所有凸和Lipschitz损失函数），通过算法公平文献的多核概念的概念。然而，通常情况下，所选的动作必须遵守一些其他约束（例如能力或奇偶校验约束）。总体而言，全能器的原始概念并不适用于这种良好动机和大量研究的损失最小化的背景。在本文中，我们介绍了综合器，以进行约束优化并研究其复杂性和含义。我们介绍的概念使学习者不知道后来将分配的损失函数以及后来将施加的约束，只要已知用于定义这些约束的亚群的范围。该论文显示了如何依靠适当的多核变体获得限制优化问题的全能器。对于一些有趣的约束和一般损失函数以及一般约束和一些有趣的损失函数，我们显示了如何通过多核的变体隐含的，该变体的复杂性与标准的多核电相似。我们证明，在一般情况下，标准的数学启动不足，表明全能器是通过相对于包含$ c $中所有级别假设集的类的多核算来暗示的。我们还研究了约束是群体公平概念时的含义。

We present a new perspective on loss minimization and the recent notion of Omniprediction through the lens of Outcome Indistingusihability. For a collection of losses and hypothesis class, omniprediction requires that a predictor provide a loss-minimization guarantee simultaneously for every loss in the collection compared to the best (loss-specific) hypothesis in the class. We present a generic template to learn predictors satisfying a guarantee we call Loss Outcome Indistinguishability. For a set of statistical tests--based on a collection of losses and hypothesis class--a predictor is Loss OI if it is indistinguishable (according to the tests) from Nature's true probabilities over outcomes. By design, Loss OI implies omniprediction in a direct and intuitive manner. We simplify Loss OI further, decomposing it into a calibration condition plus multiaccuracy for a class of functions derived from the loss and hypothesis classes. By careful analysis of this class, we give efficient constructions of omnipredictors for interesting classes of loss functions, including non-convex losses. This decomposition highlights the utility of a new multi-group fairness notion that we call calibrated multiaccuracy, which lies in between multiaccuracy and multicalibration. We show that calibrated multiaccuracy implies Loss OI for the important set of convex losses arising from Generalized Linear Models, without requiring full multicalibration. For such losses, we show an equivalence between our computational notion of Loss OI and a geometric notion of indistinguishability, formulated as Pythagorean theorems in the associated Bregman divergence. We give an efficient algorithm for calibrated multiaccuracy with computational complexity comparable to that of multiaccuracy. In all, calibrated multiaccuracy offers an interesting tradeoff point between efficiency and generality in the omniprediction landscape.

我们展示了如何采用回归函数$ \ hat {f} $，该{f} $适当地``多校准''并有效地将其后处理成近似错误的分类器，使分类器满足各种公平限制。后处理不需要标记的数据，只有一定数量的未标记数据和计算。计算$ \ hat f $的计算和样本复杂性要求与解决单个公平学习任务的要求相媲美，但实际上可以用来有效地解决许多不同的下游公平约束的学习问题。我们的后处理方法可以轻松处理相交组，从而将先前的工作推广到后处理回归功能上，以满足仅应用于分离组的公平约束。我们的工作扩展了最近的工作，表明多校准的回归函数是``omnipredictors''（即可以在后处理以最佳解决无约束的ERM问题）以进行约束优化。

We study the fundamental question of how to define and measure the distance from calibration for probabilistic predictors. While the notion of perfect calibration is well-understood, there is no consensus on how to quantify the distance from perfect calibration. Numerous calibration measures have been proposed in the literature, but it is unclear how they compare to each other, and many popular measures such as Expected Calibration Error (ECE) fail to satisfy basic properties like continuity. We present a rigorous framework for analyzing calibration measures, inspired by the literature on property testing. We propose a ground-truth notion of distance from calibration: the $\ell_1$ distance to the nearest perfectly calibrated predictor. We define a consistent calibration measure as one that is a polynomial factor approximation to the this distance. Applying our framework, we identify three calibration measures that are consistent and can be estimated efficiently: smooth calibration, interval calibration, and Laplace kernel calibration. The former two give quadratic approximations to the ground truth distance, which we show is information-theoretically optimal. Our work thus establishes fundamental lower and upper bounds on measuring distance to calibration, and also provides theoretical justification for preferring certain metrics (like Laplace kernel calibration) in practice.

作为算法公平性的概念，多核算已被证明是一个强大而多才多艺的概念，其含义远远超出了其最初的意图。这个严格的概念 - 预测在丰富的相交子群中得到了很好的校准 - 以成本为代价提供了强大的保证：学习成型预测指标的计算和样本复杂性很高，并且随着类标签的数量而成倍增长。相比之下，可以更有效地实现多辅助性的放松概念，但是，仅假设单独使用多学历，就无法保证许多最可取的多核能概念。这种紧张局势提出了一个关键问题：我们能否以多核式式保证来学习预测因素，以与多审核级相称？在这项工作中，我们定义并启动了低度多核的研究。低度的多核净化定义了越来越强大的多组公平性概念的层次结构，这些概念跨越了多辅助性和极端的多核电的原始表述。我们的主要技术贡献表明，与公平性和准确性有关的多核算的关键特性实际上表现为低级性质。重要的是，我们表明，低度的数学振动可以比完整的多核电更有效。在多级设置中，实现低度多核的样品复杂性在完整的多核电上呈指数级（在类中）提高。我们的工作提供了令人信服的证据，表明低度多核能代表了一个最佳位置，将计算和样品效率配对，并提供了强大的公平性和准确性保证。

We propose a criterion for discrimination against a specified sensitive attribute in supervised learning, where the goal is to predict some target based on available features. Assuming data about the predictor, target, and membership in the protected group are available, we show how to optimally adjust any learned predictor so as to remove discrimination according to our definition. Our framework also improves incentives by shifting the cost of poor classification from disadvantaged groups to the decision maker, who can respond by improving the classification accuracy.In line with other studies, our notion is oblivious: it depends only on the joint statistics of the predictor, the target and the protected attribute, but not on interpretation of individual features. We study the inherent limits of defining and identifying biases based on such oblivious measures, outlining what can and cannot be inferred from different oblivious tests.We illustrate our notion using a case study of FICO credit scores.

We study fairness in classification, where individuals are classified, e.g., admitted to a university, and the goal is to prevent discrimination against individuals based on their membership in some group, while maintaining utility for the classifier (the university). The main conceptual contribution of this paper is a framework for fair classification comprising (1) a (hypothetical) task-specific metric for determining the degree to which individuals are similar with respect to the classification task at hand; (2) an algorithm for maximizing utility subject to the fairness constraint, that similar individuals are treated similarly. We also present an adaptation of our approach to achieve the complementary goal of "fair affirmative action," which guarantees statistical parity (i.e., the demographics of the set of individuals receiving any classification are the same as the demographics of the underlying population), while treating similar individuals as similarly as possible. Finally, we discuss the relationship of fairness to privacy: when fairness implies privacy, and how tools developed in the context of differential privacy may be applied to fairness.

The most prevalent notions of fairness in machine learning are statistical definitions: they fix a small collection of high-level, pre-defined groups (such as race or gender), and then ask for approximate parity of some statistic of the classifier (like positive classification rate or false positive rate) across these groups. Constraints of this form are susceptible to (intentional or inadvertent) fairness gerrymandering, in which a classifier appears to be fair on each individual group, but badly violates the fairness constraint on one or more structured subgroups defined over the protected attributes (such as certain combinations of protected attribute values). We propose instead to demand statistical notions of fairness across exponentially (or infinitely) many subgroups, defined by a structured class of functions over the protected attributes. This interpolates between statistical definitions of fairness, and recently proposed individual notions of fairness, but it raises several computational challenges. It is no longer clear how to even check or audit a fixed classifier to see if it satisfies such a strong definition of fairness. We prove that the computational problem of auditing subgroup fairness for both equality of false positive rates and statistical parity is equivalent to the problem of weak agnostic learning -which means it is computationally hard in the worst case, even for simple structured subclasses. However, it also suggests that common heuristics for learning can be applied to successfully solve the auditing problem in practice.We then derive two algorithms that provably converge to the best fair distribution over classifiers in a given class, given access to oracles which can optimally solve the agnostic learning problem. The algorithms are based on a formulation of subgroup fairness as a two-player zero-sum game between a Learner (the primal player) and an Auditor (the dual player). Both algorithms compute an equilibrium of this game. We obtain our first algorithm by simulating play of the game by having Learner play an instance of the no-regret Follow the Perturbed Leader algorithm, and having Auditor play best response. This algorithm provably converges to an approximate Nash equilibrium (and thus to an approximately optimal subgroup-fair distribution over classifiers) in a polynomial number of steps. We obtain our second algorithm by simulating play of the game by having both players play Fictitious Play, which enjoys only provably asymptotic convergence, but has the merit of simplicity and faster per-step computation. We implement the Fictitious Play version using linear regression as a heuristic oracle, and show that we can effectively both audit and learn fair classifiers on real datasets.

在高赌注域中的机器学习工具的实际应用通常被调节为公平，因此预测目标应该满足相对于受保护属性的奇偶校验的一些定量概念。然而，公平性和准确性之间的确切权衡并不完全清楚，即使是对分类问题的基本范式也是如此。在本文中，我们通过在任何公平分类器的群体误差之和中提供较低的界限，在分类设置中表征统计奇偶校验和准确性之间的固有权衡。我们不可能的定理可以被解释为公平的某种不确定性原则：如果基本率不同，那么符合统计奇偶校验的任何公平分类器都必须在至少一个组中产生很大的错误。我们进一步扩展了这一结果，以便在学习公平陈述的角度下给出任何（大约）公平分类者的联合误差的下限。为了表明我们的下限是紧张的，假设Oracle访问贝叶斯（潜在不公平）分类器，我们还构造了一种返回一个随机分类器的算法，这是最佳和公平的。有趣的是，当受保护的属性可以采用超过两个值时，这个下限的扩展不承认分析解决方案。然而，在这种情况下，我们表明，通过解决线性程序，我们可以通过解决我们作为电视 - 重心问题的术语，电视距离的重心问题来有效地计算下限。在上面，我们证明，如果集团明智的贝叶斯最佳分类器是关闭的，那么学习公平的表示导致公平的替代概念，称为准确性奇偶校验，这使得错误率在组之间关闭。最后，我们还在现实世界数据集上进行实验，以确认我们的理论发现。

我们在禁用的对手存在下研究公平分类，允许获得$ \ eta $，选择培训样本的任意$ \ eta $ -flaction，并任意扰乱受保护的属性。由于战略误报，恶意演员或归责的错误，受保护属性可能不正确的设定。和现有的方法，使随机或独立假设对错误可能不满足其在这种对抗环境中的保证。我们的主要贡献是在这种对抗的环境中学习公平分类器的优化框架，这些普遍存在的准确性和公平性提供了可证明的保证。我们的框架适用于多个和非二进制保护属性，专为大类线性分数公平度量设计，并且还可以处理除了受保护的属性之外的扰动。我们证明了我们框架的近密性，对自然假设类别的保证：没有算法可以具有明显更好的准确性，并且任何具有更好公平性的算法必须具有较低的准确性。凭经验，我们评估了我们对统计率的统计税务统计税率为一个对手的统计税率产生的分类机。

我们给出了第一个多项式算法来估计$ d $ -variate概率分布的平均值，从$ \ tilde {o}（d）$独立的样本受到纯粹的差异隐私的界限。此问题的现有算法无论是呈指数运行时间，需要$ \ OMEGA（D ^ {1.5}）$样本，或仅满足较弱的集中或近似差分隐私条件。特别地，所有先前的多项式算法都需要$ d ^ {1+ \ omega（1）} $ samples，以保证“加密”高概率，1-2 ^ { - d ^ {\ omega（1） $，虽然我们的算法保留$ \ tilde {o}（d）$ SAMPS复杂性即使在此严格设置中也是如此。我们的主要技术是使用强大的方块方法（SOS）来设计差异私有算法的新方法。算法的证据是在高维算法统计数据中的许多近期作品中的一个关键主题 - 显然需要指数运行时间，但可以通过低度方块证明可以捕获其分析可以自动变成多项式 - 时间算法具有相同的可证明担保。我们展示了私有算法的类似证据现象：工作型指数机制的实例显然需要指数时间，但可以用低度SOS样张分析的指数时间，可以自动转换为多项式差异私有算法。我们证明了捕获这种现象的元定理，我们希望在私人算法设计中广泛使用。我们的技术还在高维度之间绘制了差异私有和强大统计数据之间的新连接。特别是通过我们的校验算法镜头来看，几次研究的SOS证明在近期作品中的算法稳健统计中直接产生了我们差异私有平均估计算法的关键组成部分。

Learning problems form an important category of computational tasks that generalizes many of the computations researchers apply to large real-life data sets. We ask: what concept classes can be learned privately, namely, by an algorithm whose output does not depend too heavily on any one input or specific training example? More precisely, we investigate learning algorithms that satisfy differential privacy, a notion that provides strong confidentiality guarantees in contexts where aggregate information is released about a database containing sensitive information about individuals.Our goal is a broad understanding of the resources required for private learning in terms of samples, computation time, and interaction. We demonstrate that, ignoring computational constraints, it is possible to privately agnostically learn any concept class using a sample size approximately logarithmic in the cardinality of the concept class. Therefore, almost anything learnable is learnable privately: specifically, if a concept class is learnable by a (non-private) algorithm with polynomial sample complexity and output size, then it can be learned privately using a polynomial number of samples. We also present a computationally efficient private PAC learner for the class of parity functions. This result dispels the similarity between learning with noise and private learning (both must be robust to small changes in inputs), since parity is thought to be very hard to learn given random classification noise.Local (or randomized response) algorithms are a practical class of private algorithms that have received extensive investigation. We provide a precise characterization of local private learning algorithms. We show that a concept class is learnable by a local algorithm if and only if it is learnable in the statistical query (SQ) model. Therefore, for local private learning algorithms, the similarity to learning with noise is stronger: local learning is equivalent to SQ learning, and SQ algorithms include most known noise-tolerant learning algorithms. Finally, we present a separation between the power of interactive and noninteractive local learning algorithms. Because of the equivalence to SQ learning, this result also separates adaptive and nonadaptive SQ learning.

We study the relationship between adversarial robustness and differential privacy in high-dimensional algorithmic statistics. We give the first black-box reduction from privacy to robustness which can produce private estimators with optimal tradeoffs among sample complexity, accuracy, and privacy for a wide range of fundamental high-dimensional parameter estimation problems, including mean and covariance estimation. We show that this reduction can be implemented in polynomial time in some important special cases. In particular, using nearly-optimal polynomial-time robust estimators for the mean and covariance of high-dimensional Gaussians which are based on the Sum-of-Squares method, we design the first polynomial-time private estimators for these problems with nearly-optimal samples-accuracy-privacy tradeoffs. Our algorithms are also robust to a constant fraction of adversarially-corrupted samples.

公司跨行业对机器学习（ML）的快速传播采用了重大的监管挑战。一个这样的挑战就是可伸缩性：监管机构如何有效地审核这些ML模型，以确保它们是公平的？在本文中，我们启动基于查询的审计算法的研究，这些算法可以以查询有效的方式估算ML模型的人口统计学率。我们提出了一种最佳的确定性算法，以及具有可比保证的实用随机，甲骨文效率的算法。此外，我们进一步了解了随机活动公平估计算法的最佳查询复杂性。我们对主动公平估计的首次探索旨在将AI治理置于更坚定的理论基础上。

可实现和不可知性的可读性的等价性是学习理论的基本现象。与PAC学习和回归等古典设置范围的变种，近期趋势，如对冲强劲和私人学习，我们仍然缺乏统一理论;等同性的传统证据往往是不同的，并且依赖于强大的模型特异性假设，如统一的收敛和样本压缩。在这项工作中，我们给出了第一个独立的框架，解释了可实现和不可知性的可读性的等价性：三行黑箱减少简化，统一，并在各种各样的环境中扩展了我们的理解。这包括没有已知的学报的模型，例如学习任意分布假设或一般损失，以及许多其他流行的设置，例如强大的学习，部分学习，公平学习和统计查询模型。更一般地，我们认为可实现和不可知的学习的等价性实际上是我们调用属性概括的更广泛现象的特殊情况：可以满足有限的学习算法（例如\噪声公差，隐私，稳定性）的任何理想性质假设类（可能在某些变化中）延伸到任何学习的假设类。

The fair-ranking problem, which asks to rank a given set of items to maximize utility subject to group fairness constraints, has received attention in the fairness, information retrieval, and machine learning literature. Recent works, however, observe that errors in socially-salient (including protected) attributes of items can significantly undermine fairness guarantees of existing fair-ranking algorithms and raise the problem of mitigating the effect of such errors. We study the fair-ranking problem under a model where socially-salient attributes of items are randomly and independently perturbed. We present a fair-ranking framework that incorporates group fairness requirements along with probabilistic information about perturbations in socially-salient attributes. We provide provable guarantees on the fairness and utility attainable by our framework and show that it is information-theoretically impossible to significantly beat these guarantees. Our framework works for multiple non-disjoint attributes and a general class of fairness constraints that includes proportional and equal representation. Empirically, we observe that, compared to baselines, our algorithm outputs rankings with higher fairness, and has a similar or better fairness-utility trade-off compared to baselines.

最近的工作突出了因果关系在设计公平决策算法中的作用。但是，尚不清楚现有的公平因果概念如何相互关系，或者将这些定义作为设计原则的后果是什么。在这里，我们首先将算法公平性的流行因果定义组装成两个广泛的家庭：（1）那些限制决策对反事实差异的影响的家庭； （2）那些限制了法律保护特征（如种族和性别）对决策的影响。然后，我们在分析和经验上表明，两个定义的家庭\ emph {几乎总是总是} - 从一种理论意义上讲 - 导致帕累托占主导地位的决策政策，这意味着每个利益相关者都有一个偏爱的替代性，不受限制的政策从大型自然级别中绘制。例如，在大学录取决定的情况下，每位利益相关者都不支持任何对学术准备和多样性的中立或积极偏好的利益相关者，将不利于因果公平定义的政策。的确，在因果公平的明显定义下，我们证明了由此产生的政策要求承认所有具有相同概率的学生，无论学术资格或小组成员身份如何。我们的结果突出了正式的局限性和因果公平的常见数学观念的潜在不利后果。

价格歧视，这是指为不同客户群体的不同价格进行规定的策略，已广泛用于在线零售。虽然它有助于提高在线零售商的收入，但它可能会对公平产生严重关切，甚至违反了监管和法律。本文研究了公平限制下动态歧视性定价的问题。特别是，我们考虑一个有限的销售长度$ T $的单一产品，为一组客户提供两组客户。每组客户都有其未知的需求功能，需要学习。对于每个销售期间，卖方确定每组的价格并观察其购买行为。虽然现有文学主要侧重于最大化收入，但在动态定价文学中确保不同客户的公平尚未完全探索。在这项工作中，我们采用了（Cohen等人）的公平概念。对于价格公平性，我们在遗憾方面提出了最佳的动态定价政策，从而强制执行严格的价格公平制约。与标准$ \ sqrt {t} $ - 在线学习中的遗憾遗憾，我们表明我们案例中的最佳遗憾是$ \ tilde {\ theta}（t ^ {4/5}）$。我们进一步将算法扩展到更普遍的公平概念，包括作为一个特例的需求公平。为了处理这一普通类，我们提出了一个柔和的公平约束，并开发了实现$ \ tilde {o}（t ^ {4/5}）$后悔的动态定价政策。

我们考虑了贝叶斯的预测汇总模型，在观察了关于未知二进制事件的私人信号之后，$ n $专家向校长报告了有关事件的后验信念，然后将报告汇总为事件的单个预测。专家的信号和事件的结果遵循校长未知的联合分配，但校长可以访问I.I.D.来自分布的“样本”，每个样本都是专家报告的元组（不是信号）和事件的实现。使用这些样品，主要目的是找到$ \ varepsilon $ - 易于最佳（贝叶斯）聚合器。我们研究此问题的样本复杂性。我们表明，对于任意离散分布，样本的数量必须至少为$ \ tilde \ omega（m^{n-2} / \ varepsilon）$，其中$ m $是每个专家信号空间的大小。该样本复杂性在专家$ n $的数量中成倍增长。但是，如果专家的信号是独立的，以实现事件的实现为条件，那么样本复杂性将大大降低到$ \ tilde o（1 / \ varepsilon^2）$，这不取决于$ n $。

差异隐私通常使用比理论更大的隐私参数应用于理想的理想。已经提出了宽大隐私参数的各种非正式理由。在这项工作中，我们考虑了部分差异隐私（DP），该隐私允许以每个属性为基础量化隐私保证。在此框架中，我们研究了几个基本数据分析和学习任务，并设计了其每个属性隐私参数的算法，其较小的人（即所有属性）的最佳隐私参数比最佳的隐私参数。