会员推理攻击是机器学习模型中最简单的隐私泄漏形式之一：给定数据点和模型，确定该点是否用于培训模型。当查询其培训数据时，现有会员推理攻击利用模型的异常置信度。如果对手访问模型的预测标签，则不会申请这些攻击，而不会置信度。在本文中，我们介绍了仅限标签的会员资格推理攻击。我们的攻击而不是依赖置信分数，而是评估模型预测标签在扰动下的稳健性，以获得细粒度的隶属信号。这些扰动包括常见的数据增强或对抗例。我们经验表明，我们的标签占会员推理攻击与先前攻击相符，以便需要访问模型信心。我们进一步证明，仅限标签攻击违反了（隐含或明确）依赖于我们呼叫信心屏蔽的现象的员工推论攻击的多种防御。这些防御修改了模型的置信度分数以挫败攻击，但留下模型的预测标签不变。我们的标签攻击展示了置信性掩蔽不是抵御会员推理的可行的防御策略。最后，我们调查唯一的案例标签攻击，该攻击推断为少量异常值数据点。我们显示仅标签攻击也匹配此设置中基于置信的攻击。我们发现具有差异隐私和（强）L2正则化的培训模型是唯一已知的防御策略，成功地防止所有攻击。即使差异隐私预算太高而无法提供有意义的可证明担保，这仍然存在。

员额推理攻击允许对训练的机器学习模型进行对手以预测模型的训练数据集中包含特定示例。目前使用平均案例的“精度”度量来评估这些攻击，该攻击未能表征攻击是否可以自信地识别培训集的任何成员。我们认为，应该通过计算其低（例如<0.1％）假阳性率来计算攻击来评估攻击，并在以这种方式评估时发现大多数事先攻击差。为了解决这一问题，我们开发了一个仔细结合文献中多种想法的似然比攻击（Lira）。我们的攻击是低于虚假阳性率的10倍，并且在攻击现有度量的情况下也严格占主导地位。

机器学习（ML）模型已广泛应用于各种应用，包括图像分类，文本生成，音频识别和图形数据分析。然而，最近的研究表明，ML模型容易受到隶属推导攻击（MIS），其目的是推断数据记录是否用于训练目标模型。 ML模型上的MIA可以直接导致隐私违规行为。例如，通过确定已经用于训练与某种疾病相关的模型的临床记录，攻击者可以推断临床记录的所有者具有很大的机会。近年来，MIS已被证明对各种ML模型有效，例如，分类模型和生成模型。同时，已经提出了许多防御方法来减轻米西亚。虽然ML模型上的MIAS形成了一个新的新兴和快速增长的研究区，但还没有对这一主题进行系统的调查。在本文中，我们对会员推论和防御进行了第一个全面调查。我们根据其特征提供攻击和防御的分类管理，并讨论其优点和缺点。根据本次调查中确定的限制和差距，我们指出了几个未来的未来研究方向，以激发希望遵循该地区的研究人员。这项调查不仅是研究社区的参考，而且还为该研究领域之外的研究人员带来了清晰的照片。为了进一步促进研究人员，我们创建了一个在线资源存储库，并与未来的相关作品继续更新。感兴趣的读者可以在https://github.com/hongshenghu/membership-inference-machine-learning-literature找到存储库。

机器学习模型容易记住敏感数据，使它们容易受到会员推理攻击的攻击，其中对手的目的是推断是否使用输入样本来训练模型。在过去的几年中，研究人员产生了许多会员推理攻击和防御。但是，这些攻击和防御采用各种策略，并在不同的模型和数据集中进行。但是，缺乏全面的基准意味着我们不了解现有攻击和防御的优势和劣势。我们通过对不同的会员推理攻击和防御措施进行大规模测量来填补这一空白。我们通过研究九项攻击和六项防御措施来系统化成员的推断，并在整体评估中衡量不同攻击和防御的性能。然后，我们量化威胁模型对这些攻击结果的影响。我们发现，威胁模型的某些假设，例如相同架构和阴影和目标模型之间的相同分布是不必要的。我们也是第一个对从Internet收集的现实世界数据而不是实验室数据集进行攻击的人。我们进一步研究是什么决定了会员推理攻击的表现，并揭示了通常认为过度拟合水平不足以成功攻击。取而代之的是，成员和非成员样本之间的熵/横向熵的詹森 - 香农距离与攻击性能的相关性更好。这为我们提供了一种新的方法，可以在不进行攻击的情况下准确预测会员推理风险。最后，我们发现数据增强在更大程度上降低了现有攻击的性能，我们提出了使用增强作用的自适应攻击来训练阴影和攻击模型，以改善攻击性能。

A distribution inference attack aims to infer statistical properties of data used to train machine learning models. These attacks are sometimes surprisingly potent, but the factors that impact distribution inference risk are not well understood and demonstrated attacks often rely on strong and unrealistic assumptions such as full knowledge of training environments even in supposedly black-box threat scenarios. To improve understanding of distribution inference risks, we develop a new black-box attack that even outperforms the best known white-box attack in most settings. Using this new attack, we evaluate distribution inference risk while relaxing a variety of assumptions about the adversary's knowledge under black-box access, like known model architectures and label-only access. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of previously proposed defenses and introduce new defenses. We find that although noise-based defenses appear to be ineffective, a simple re-sampling defense can be highly effective. Code is available at https://github.com/iamgroot42/dissecting_distribution_inference

Deep ensemble learning has been shown to improve accuracy by training multiple neural networks and averaging their outputs. Ensemble learning has also been suggested to defend against membership inference attacks that undermine privacy. In this paper, we empirically demonstrate a trade-off between these two goals, namely accuracy and privacy (in terms of membership inference attacks), in deep ensembles. Using a wide range of datasets and model architectures, we show that the effectiveness of membership inference attacks increases when ensembling improves accuracy. We analyze the impact of various factors in deep ensembles and demonstrate the root cause of the trade-off. Then, we evaluate common defenses against membership inference attacks based on regularization and differential privacy. We show that while these defenses can mitigate the effectiveness of membership inference attacks, they simultaneously degrade ensemble accuracy. We illustrate similar trade-off in more advanced and state-of-the-art ensembling techniques, such as snapshot ensembles and diversified ensemble networks. Finally, we propose a simple yet effective defense for deep ensembles to break the trade-off and, consequently, improve the accuracy and privacy, simultaneously.

We quantitatively investigate how machine learning models leak information about the individual data records on which they were trained. We focus on the basic membership inference attack: given a data record and black-box access to a model, determine if the record was in the model's training dataset. To perform membership inference against a target model, we make adversarial use of machine learning and train our own inference model to recognize differences in the target model's predictions on the inputs that it trained on versus the inputs that it did not train on.We empirically evaluate our inference techniques on classification models trained by commercial "machine learning as a service" providers such as Google and Amazon. Using realistic datasets and classification tasks, including a hospital discharge dataset whose membership is sensitive from the privacy perspective, we show that these models can be vulnerable to membership inference attacks. We then investigate the factors that influence this leakage and evaluate mitigation strategies.

对机器学习模型的会员推理攻击（MIA）可能会导致模型培训中使用的培训数据集的严重隐私风险。在本文中，我们提出了一种针对成员推理攻击（MIAS）的新颖有效的神经元引导的防御方法。我们确定了针对MIA的现有防御机制的关键弱点，在该机制中，他们不能同时防御两个常用的基于神经网络的MIA，表明应分别评估这两次攻击以确保防御效果。我们提出了Neuguard，这是一种新的防御方法，可以通过对象共同控制输出和内部神经元的激活，以指导训练集的模型输出和测试集的模型输出以具有近距离分布。 Neuguard由类别的差异最小化靶向限制最终输出神经元和层平衡输出控制的目标，旨在限制每一层中的内部神经元。我们评估Neuguard，并将其与最新的防御能力与两个基于神经网络的MIA，五个最强的基于度量的MIA，包括三个基准数据集中的新提出的仅标签MIA。结果表明，Neuguard通过提供大大改善的公用事业权衡权衡，一般性和间接费用来优于最先进的防御能力。

作为对培训数据隐私的长期威胁，会员推理攻击（MIA）在机器学习模型中无处不在。现有作品证明了培训的区分性与测试损失分布与模型对MIA的脆弱性之间的密切联系。在现有结果的激励下，我们提出了一个基于轻松损失的新型培训框架，并具有更可实现的学习目标，从而导致概括差距狭窄和隐私泄漏减少。 RelaseLoss适用于任何分类模型，具有易于实施和可忽略不计的开销的额外好处。通过对具有不同方式（图像，医疗数据，交易记录）的五个数据集进行广泛的评估，我们的方法始终优于针对MIA和模型效用的韧性，以最先进的防御机制优于最先进的防御机制。我们的防御是第一个可以承受广泛攻击的同时，同时保存（甚至改善）目标模型的效用。源代码可从https://github.com/dingfanchen/relaxloss获得

Adaptive attacks have (rightfully) become the de facto standard for evaluating defenses to adversarial examples. We find, however, that typical adaptive evaluations are incomplete. We demonstrate that thirteen defenses recently published at ICLR, ICML and NeurIPS-and which illustrate a diverse set of defense strategies-can be circumvented despite attempting to perform evaluations using adaptive attacks. While prior evaluation papers focused mainly on the end result-showing that a defense was ineffective-this paper focuses on laying out the methodology and the approach necessary to perform an adaptive attack. Some of our attack strategies are generalizable, but no single strategy would have been sufficient for all defenses. This underlines our key message that adaptive attacks cannot be automated and always require careful and appropriate tuning to a given defense. We hope that these analyses will serve as guidance on how to properly perform adaptive attacks against defenses to adversarial examples, and thus will allow the community to make further progress in building more robust models.

Deep neural networks are susceptible to various inference attacks as they remember information about their training data. We design white-box inference attacks to perform a comprehensive privacy analysis of deep learning models. We measure the privacy leakage through parameters of fully trained models as well as the parameter updates of models during training. We design inference algorithms for both centralized and federated learning, with respect to passive and active inference attackers, and assuming different adversary prior knowledge.We evaluate our novel white-box membership inference attacks against deep learning algorithms to trace their training data records. We show that a straightforward extension of the known black-box attacks to the white-box setting (through analyzing the outputs of activation functions) is ineffective. We therefore design new algorithms tailored to the white-box setting by exploiting the privacy vulnerabilities of the stochastic gradient descent algorithm, which is the algorithm used to train deep neural networks. We investigate the reasons why deep learning models may leak information about their training data. We then show that even well-generalized models are significantly susceptible to white-box membership inference attacks, by analyzing stateof-the-art pre-trained and publicly available models for the CIFAR dataset. We also show how adversarial participants, in the federated learning setting, can successfully run active membership inference attacks against other participants, even when the global model achieves high prediction accuracies.

Machine learning (ML) has become a core component of many real-world applications and training data is a key factor that drives current progress. This huge success has led Internet companies to deploy machine learning as a service (MLaaS). Recently, the first membership inference attack has shown that extraction of information on the training set is possible in such MLaaS settings, which has severe security and privacy implications.However, the early demonstrations of the feasibility of such attacks have many assumptions on the adversary, such as using multiple so-called shadow models, knowledge of the target model structure, and having a dataset from the same distribution as the target model's training data. We relax all these key assumptions, thereby showing that such attacks are very broadly applicable at low cost and thereby pose a more severe risk than previously thought. We present the most comprehensive study so far on this emerging and developing threat using eight diverse datasets which show the viability of the proposed attacks across domains.In addition, we propose the first effective defense mechanisms against such broader class of membership inference attacks that maintain a high level of utility of the ML model.

鉴于对机器学习模型的访问，可以进行对手重建模型的培训数据？这项工作从一个强大的知情对手的镜头研究了这个问题，他们知道除了一个之外的所有培训数据点。通过实例化混凝土攻击，我们表明重建此严格威胁模型中的剩余数据点是可行的。对于凸模型（例如Logistic回归），重建攻击很简单，可以以封闭形式导出。对于更常规的模型（例如神经网络），我们提出了一种基于训练的攻击策略，该攻击策略接收作为输入攻击的模型的权重，并产生目标数据点。我们展示了我们对MNIST和CIFAR-10训练的图像分类器的攻击的有效性，并系统地研究了标准机器学习管道的哪些因素影响重建成功。最后，我们从理论上调查了有多差异的隐私足以通过知情对手减轻重建攻击。我们的工作提供了有效的重建攻击，模型开发人员可以用于评估超出以前作品中考虑的一般设置中的个别点的记忆（例如，生成语言模型或访问培训梯度）;它表明，标准模型具有存储足够信息的能力，以实现培训数据点的高保真重建;它表明，差异隐私可以成功减轻该参数制度中的攻击，其中公用事业劣化最小。

Differential privacy is a strong notion for privacy that can be used to prove formal guarantees, in terms of a privacy budget, , about how much information is leaked by a mechanism. However, implementations of privacy-preserving machine learning often select large values of in order to get acceptable utility of the model, with little understanding of the impact of such choices on meaningful privacy. Moreover, in scenarios where iterative learning procedures are used, differential privacy variants that offer tighter analyses are used which appear to reduce the needed privacy budget but present poorly understood trade-offs between privacy and utility. In this paper, we quantify the impact of these choices on privacy in experiments with logistic regression and neural network models. Our main finding is that there is a huge gap between the upper bounds on privacy loss that can be guaranteed, even with advanced mechanisms, and the effective privacy loss that can be measured using current inference attacks. Current mechanisms for differentially private machine learning rarely offer acceptable utility-privacy trade-offs with guarantees for complex learning tasks: settings that provide limited accuracy loss provide meaningless privacy guarantees, and settings that provide strong privacy guarantees result in useless models.

从公共机器学习（ML）模型中泄漏数据是一个越来越重要的领域，因为ML的商业和政府应用可以利用多个数据源，可能包括用户和客户的敏感数据。我们对几个方面的当代进步进行了全面的调查，涵盖了非自愿数据泄漏，这对ML模型很自然，潜在的恶毒泄漏是由隐私攻击引起的，以及目前可用的防御机制。我们专注于推理时间泄漏，这是公开可用模型的最可能场景。我们首先在不同的数据，任务和模型体系结构的背景下讨论什么是泄漏。然后，我们提出了跨非自愿和恶意泄漏的分类法，可用的防御措施，然后进行当前可用的评估指标和应用。我们以杰出的挑战和开放性的问题结束，概述了一些有希望的未来研究方向。

In a membership inference attack, an attacker aims to infer whether a data sample is in a target classifier's training dataset or not. Specifically, given a black-box access to the target classifier, the attacker trains a binary classifier, which takes a data sample's confidence score vector predicted by the target classifier as an input and predicts the data sample to be a member or non-member of the target classifier's training dataset. Membership inference attacks pose severe privacy and security threats to the training dataset. Most existing defenses leverage differential privacy when training the target classifier or regularize the training process of the target classifier. These defenses suffer from two key limitations: 1) they do not have formal utility-loss guarantees of the confidence score vectors, and 2) they achieve suboptimal privacy-utility tradeoffs.In this work, we propose MemGuard, the first defense with formal utility-loss guarantees against black-box membership inference attacks. Instead of tampering the training process of the target classifier, MemGuard adds noise to each confidence score vector predicted by the target classifier. Our key observation is that attacker uses a classifier to predict member or non-member and classifier is vulnerable to adversarial examples. Based on the observation, we propose to add a carefully crafted noise vector to a confidence score vector to turn it into an adversarial example that misleads the attacker's classifier. Specifically, MemGuard works in two phases. In Phase I, MemGuard finds a carefully crafted noise vector that can turn a confidence score vector into an adversarial example, which is likely to mislead the attacker's classifier to make a random guessing at member or non-member. We find such carefully crafted noise vector via a new method that we design to incorporate the unique utility-loss constraints on the noise vector. In Phase II, Mem-Guard adds the noise vector to the confidence score vector with a certain probability, which is selected to satisfy a given utility-loss budget on the confidence score vector. Our experimental results on

在模型提取攻击中，对手可以通过反复查询并根据获得的预测来窃取通过公共API暴露的机器学习模型。为了防止模型窃取，现有的防御措施专注于检测恶意查询，截断或扭曲输出，因此必然会为合法用户引入鲁棒性和模型实用程序之间的权衡。取而代之的是，我们建议通过要求用户在阅读模型的预测之前完成工作证明来阻碍模型提取。这可以通过大大增加（甚至高达100倍）来阻止攻击者，以利用查询访问模型提取所需的计算工作。由于我们校准完成每个查询的工作证明所需的努力，因此这仅为常规用户（最多2倍）引入一个轻微的开销。为了实现这一目标，我们的校准应用了来自差异隐私的工具来衡量查询揭示的信息。我们的方法不需要对受害者模型进行任何修改，可以通过机器学习从业人员来应用其公开暴露的模型免于轻易被盗。

会员推理攻击（MIA）在机器学习模型的培训数据上提出隐私风险。使用MIA，如果目标数据是训练数据集的成员，则攻击者猜测。对MIAS的最先进的防御，蒸馏为会员隐私（DMP），不仅需要私人数据来保护但是大量未标记的公共数据。但是，在某些隐私敏感域名，如医疗和财务，公共数据的可用性并不明显。此外，通过使用生成的对策网络生成公共数据的琐碎方法显着降低了DMP的作者报道的模型精度。为了克服这个问题，我们在不需要公共数据的情况下，使用知识蒸馏提出对米西亚的小说防御。我们的实验表明，我们防御的隐私保护和准确性与MIA研究中使用的基准表格数据集的DMP相媲美，我们的国防有更好的隐私式权限远非现有防御不使用图像数据集CIFAR10的公共数据。

半监督学习（SSL）利用标记和未标记的数据来训练机器学习（ML）模型。最先进的SSL方法可以通过利用更少的标记数据来实现与监督学习相当的性能。但是，大多数现有作品都集中在提高SSL的性能。在这项工作中，我们通过研究SSL的培训数据隐私来采取不同的角度。具体而言，我们建议针对由SSL训练的ML模型进行的第一个基于数据增强的成员推理攻击。给定数据样本和黑框访问模型，成员推理攻击的目标是确定数据样本是否属于模型的训练数据集。我们的评估表明，拟议的攻击可以始终超过现有的成员推理攻击，并针对由SSL训练的模型实现最佳性能。此外，我们发现，SSL中会员泄漏的原因与受到监督学习中普遍认为的原因不同，即过度拟合（培训和测试准确性之间的差距）。我们观察到，SSL模型已被概括为测试数据（几乎为0个过度拟合），但“记住”训练数据通过提供更自信的预测，无论其正确性如何。我们还探索了早期停止，作为防止成员推理攻击SSL的对策。结果表明，早期停止可以减轻会员推理攻击，但由于模型的实用性降解成本。

会员推理攻击（MIS）旨在确定特定样本是否用于培训预测模型。知道这可能确实导致隐私违约。可以说，大多数MIS利用模型的预测分数 - 每个输出的概率给出一些输入 - 在其训练的模型趋于不同地在其训练数据上表现不同。我们认为这是许多现代深度网络架构的谬论，例如，Relu型神经网络几乎总是远离训练数据的高预测分数。因此，MIS将误会失败，因为这种行为不仅导致高伪率，不仅在已知的域名上，而且对分发数据外，并且隐含地作为针对偏心的防御。具体地，使用生成的对抗网络，我们能够产生虚假分类为培训数据的一部分的潜在无限数量的样本。换句话说，MIS的威胁被高估，并且泄漏的信息较少地假设。此外，在分类器的过度自信和对偏话的易感性之间实际上有一个权衡：更频率越多，他们不知道，对远离训练数据的低信任预测，他们越远，他们越多，揭示了训练数据。