Pre-trained language models (PLMs) are known to improve the generalization performance of natural language understanding models by leveraging large amounts of data during the pre-training phase. However, the out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization problem remains a challenge in many NLP tasks, limiting the real-world deployment of these methods. This paper presents the first attempt at creating a unified benchmark named GLUE-X for evaluating OOD robustness in NLP models, highlighting the importance of OOD robustness and providing insights on how to measure the robustness of a model and how to improve it. The benchmark includes 13 publicly available datasets for OOD testing, and evaluations are conducted on 8 classic NLP tasks over 19 popularly used PLMs. Our findings confirm the need for improved OOD accuracy in NLP tasks, as significant performance degradation was observed in all settings compared to in-distribution (ID) accuracy.

几乎没有命名的实体识别（NER）对于在有限的资源领域中标记的实体标记至关重要，因此近年来受到了适当的关注。现有的几声方法主要在域内设置下进行评估。相比之下，对于这些固有的忠实模型如何使用一些标记的域内示例在跨域NER中执行的方式知之甚少。本文提出了一种两步以理性为中心的数据增强方法，以提高模型的泛化能力。几个数据集中的结果表明，与先前的最新方法相比，我们的模型无形方法可显着提高跨域NER任务的性能，包括反事实数据增强和及时调用方法。我们的代码可在\ url {https://github.com/lifan-yuan/factmix}上获得。

最近的自然语言理解进展（NLU）已经被驱动，部分是由胶水，超级格，小队等的基准。事实上，许多NLU模型现在在许多任务中匹配或超过“人类水平”性能这些基准。然而，大多数这些基准测试都提供模型访问相对大量的标记数据进行培训。因此，该模型提供了比人类所需的更多数据，以实现强大的性能。这有动机侧重于侧重于改善NLU模型的少量学习性能。然而，缺乏少量射门的标准化评估基准，导致不同纸张中的不同实验设置。为了帮助加速这一工作的工作，我们介绍了线索（受限制的语言理解评估标准），这是评估NLU模型的几次拍摄学习功能的基准。我们证明，虽然最近的模型在获得大量标记数据时达到人类性能，但对于大多数任务，少量拍摄设置中的性能存在巨大差距。我们还展示了几个拍摄设置中替代模型家族和适应技术之间的差异。最后，我们讨论了在设计实验设置时讨论了评估真实少量学习绩效的实验设置，并提出了统一的标准化方法，以获得少量学习评估。我们的目标是鼓励对NLU模型的研究，可以概括为具有少数示例的新任务。线索的代码和数据可以在https://github.com/microsoft/clues提供。

尽管对检测分配（OOD）示例的重要性一致，但就OOD示例的正式定义几乎没有共识，以及如何最好地检测到它们。我们将这些示例分类为它们是否表现出背景换档或语义移位，并发现ood检测，模型校准和密度估计（文本语言建模）的两个主要方法，对这些类型的ood数据具有不同的行为。在14对分布和ood英语自然语言理解数据集中，我们发现密度估计方法一致地在背景移位设置中展开校准方法，同时在语义移位设置中执行更糟。此外，我们发现两种方法通常都无法检测到挑战数据中的示例，突出显示当前方法的弱点。由于没有单个方法在所有设置上都效果很好，因此在评估不同的检测方法时，我们的结果呼叫了OOD示例的明确定义。

State-of-the-art computer vision systems are trained to predict a fixed set of predetermined object categories. This restricted form of supervision limits their generality and usability since additional labeled data is needed to specify any other visual concept. Learning directly from raw text about images is a promising alternative which leverages a much broader source of supervision. We demonstrate that the simple pre-training task of predicting which caption goes with which image is an efficient and scalable way to learn SOTA image representations from scratch on a dataset of 400 million (image, text) pairs collected from the internet. After pre-training, natural language is used to reference learned visual concepts (or describe new ones) enabling zero-shot transfer of the model to downstream tasks. We study the performance of this approach by benchmarking on over 30 different existing computer vision datasets, spanning tasks such as OCR, action recognition in videos, geo-localization, and many types of fine-grained object classification. The model transfers non-trivially to most tasks and is often competitive with a fully supervised baseline without the need for any dataset specific training. For instance, we match the accuracy of the original ResNet-50 on ImageNet zero-shot without needing to use any of the 1.28 million training examples it was trained on. We release our code and pre-trained model weights at https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP.

Pre-trained language models (PLMs) achieve remarkable performance on many downstream tasks, but may fail in giving reliable estimates of their predictive uncertainty. Given the lack of a comprehensive understanding of PLMs calibration, we take a close look into this new research problem, aiming to answer two questions: (1) Do PLMs learn to become calibrated in the training process? (2) How effective are existing calibration methods? For the first question, we conduct fine-grained control experiments to study the dynamic change in PLMs' calibration performance in training. We consider six factors as control variables, including dataset difficulty, available training samples, training steps, the number of tunable parameters, model scale, and pretraining. In experiments, we observe a consistent change in calibration performance across six factors. We find that PLMs don't learn to become calibrated in training, evidenced by the continual increase in confidence, no matter the predictions are correct or not. We highlight that our finding presents some contradiction with two established conclusions: (a) Larger PLMs are more calibrated; (b) Pretraining improves model calibration. Next, we study the effectiveness of existing calibration methods in mitigating the overconfidence issue, in both in-distribution and various out-of-distribution settings. Besides unlearnable calibration methods, we adapt two recently proposed learnable methods that directly collect data to train models to have reasonable confidence estimations. Also, we propose extended learnable methods based on existing ones to further improve or maintain PLMs calibration without sacrificing the original task performance. Experimental results show that learnable methods significantly reduce PLMs' confidence in wrong predictions, and our methods exhibit superior performance compared with previous methods.

Previous studies observed that finetuned models may be better base models than the vanilla pretrained model. Such a model, finetuned on some source dataset, may provide a better starting point for a new finetuning process on a desired target dataset. Here, we perform a systematic analysis of this intertraining scheme, over a wide range of English classification tasks. Surprisingly, our analysis suggests that the potential intertraining gain can be analyzed independently for the target dataset under consideration, and for a base model being considered as a starting point. This is in contrast to current perception that the alignment between the target dataset and the source dataset used to generate the base model is a major factor in determining intertraining success. We analyze different aspects that contribute to each. Furthermore, we leverage our analysis to propose a practical and efficient approach to determine if and how to select a base model in real-world settings. Last, we release an updating ranking of best models in the HuggingFace hub per architecture https://ibm.github.io/model-recycling/.

大规模的预训练语言模型在广泛的自然语言理解（NLU）任务中取得了巨大的成功，甚至超过人类性能。然而，最近的研究表明，这些模型的稳健性可能受到精心制作的文本对抗例子的挑战。虽然已经提出了几个单独的数据集来评估模型稳健性，但仍缺少原则和全面的基准。在本文中，我们呈现对抗性胶水（AdvGlue），这是一个新的多任务基准，以定量和彻底探索和评估各种对抗攻击下现代大规模语言模型的脆弱性。特别是，我们系统地应用14种文本对抗的攻击方法来构建一个粘合的援助，这是由人类进一步验证的可靠注释。我们的调查结果总结如下。 （i）大多数现有的对抗性攻击算法容易发生无效或暧昧的对手示例，其中大约90％的含量改变原始语义含义或误导性的人的注册人。因此，我们执行仔细的过滤过程来策划高质量的基准。 （ii）我们测试的所有语言模型和强大的培训方法在AdvGlue上表现不佳，差价远远落后于良性准确性。我们希望我们的工作能够激励开发新的对抗攻击，这些攻击更加隐身，更加统一，以及针对复杂的对抗性攻击的新强大语言模型。 Advglue在https://adversarialglue.github.io提供。

Knowledge-grounded dialogue systems powered by large language models often generate responses that, while fluent, are not attributable to a relevant source of information. Progress towards models that do not exhibit this issue requires evaluation metrics that can quantify its prevalence. To this end, we introduce the Benchmark for Evaluation of Grounded INteraction (BEGIN), comprised of 12k dialogue turns generated by neural dialogue systems trained on three knowledgegrounded dialogue corpora. We collect human annotations assessing the extent to which the models' responses can be attributed to the given background information. We then use BEGIN to analyze eight evaluation metrics. We find that these metrics rely on spurious correlations, do not reliably distinguish attributable abstractive responses from unattributable ones, and perform substantially worse when the knowledge source is longer. Our findings underscore the need for more sophisticated and robust evaluation metrics for knowledge-grounded dialogue. We make BEGIN publicly available at https://github.com/ google/BEGIN-dataset.

Powerful generative models have led to recent progress in question generation (QG). However, it is difficult to measure advances in QG research since there are no standardized resources that allow a uniform comparison among approaches. In this paper, we introduce QG-Bench, a multilingual and multidomain benchmark for QG that unifies existing question answering datasets by converting them to a standard QG setting. It includes general-purpose datasets such as SQuAD for English, datasets from ten domains and two styles, as well as datasets in eight different languages. Using QG-Bench as a reference, we perform an extensive analysis of the capabilities of language models for the task. First, we propose robust QG baselines based on fine-tuning generative language models. Then, we complement automatic evaluation based on standard metrics with an extensive manual evaluation, which in turn sheds light on the difficulty of evaluating QG models. Finally, we analyse both the domain adaptability of these models as well as the effectiveness of multilingual models in languages other than English. QG-Bench is released along with the fine-tuned models presented in the paper https://github.com/asahi417/lm-question-generation, which are also available as a demo https://autoqg.net/.

人工智能的最新趋势是将验证的模型用于语言和视觉任务，这些模型已经实现了非凡的表现，但也令人困惑。因此，以各种方式探索这些模型的能力对该领域至关重要。在本文中，我们探讨了模型的可靠性，在其中我们将可靠的模型定义为一个不仅可以实现强大的预测性能，而且在许多涉及不确定性（例如选择性预测，开放式设置识别）的决策任务上，在许多决策任务上表现出色，而且表现良好。强大的概括（例如，准确性和适当的评分规则，例如在分布数据集中和分发数据集上的对数可能性）和适应性（例如，主动学习，几乎没有射击不确定性）。我们设计了40个数据集的10种任务类型，以评估视觉和语言域上可靠性的不同方面。为了提高可靠性，我们分别开发了VIT-PLEX和T5-PLEX，分别针对视觉和语言方式扩展了大型模型。 PLEX极大地改善了跨可靠性任务的最先进，并简化了传统协议，因为它可以改善开箱即用的性能，并且不需要设计分数或为每个任务调整模型。我们演示了高达1B参数的模型尺寸的缩放效果，并预处理数据集大小最多4B示例。我们还展示了PLEX在具有挑战性的任务上的功能，包括零射门的开放式识别，主动学习和对话语言理解中的不确定性。

Recent studies have shown the impressive efficacy of counterfactually augmented data (CAD) for reducing NLU models' reliance on spurious features and improving their generalizability. However, current methods still heavily rely on human efforts or task-specific designs to generate counterfactuals, thereby impeding CAD's applicability to a broad range of NLU tasks. In this paper, we present AutoCAD, a fully automatic and task-agnostic CAD generation framework. AutoCAD first leverages a classifier to unsupervisedly identify rationales as spans to be intervened, which disentangles spurious and causal features. Then, AutoCAD performs controllable generation enhanced by unlikelihood training to produce diverse counterfactuals. Extensive evaluations on multiple out-of-domain and challenge benchmarks demonstrate that AutoCAD consistently and significantly boosts the out-of-distribution performance of powerful pre-trained models across different NLU tasks, which is comparable or even better than previous state-of-the-art human-in-the-loop or task-specific CAD methods. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/thu-coai/AutoCAD.

预先训练的语言模型在文本分类任务中取得了成功，但易于从偏见的数据集学习虚假相关性，因此在进行新域中的推论时易受攻击。前后工作通过HOC解释算法揭示了这种虚假模式，这会计算输入功能的重要性。此外，该模型正规化以将重要性分数与人类知识对齐，以便消除了意外的模型行为。然而，这种正则化技术缺乏灵活性和覆盖，因为仅调整了对预定义的特征列表的重要性分数，而可以几乎没有结合出更复杂的人类知识，例如特征交互和模式泛化。在这项工作中，我们建议通过收集有关观察到的偏见的人提供的组成解释来改进目标领域的学习语言模型。通过将这些解析解析为可执行的逻辑规则，来自一小组解释的人类指定的细化建议可以推广到更多的训练示例。我们还介绍了一个正常化术语，允许调整功能的重要性和相互作用以更好地纠正模型行为。我们通过显示目标域中的改进性能以及改进后的模型公平性，展示了提出方法对两个文本分类任务的有效性。

We consider the end-to-end abstract-to-title generation problem, exploring seven recent transformer based models (including ChatGPT) fine-tuned on more than 30k abstract-title pairs from NLP and machine learning venues. As an extension, we also consider the harder problem of generating humorous paper titles. For the latter, we compile the first large-scale humor annotated dataset for scientific papers in the NLP/ML domains, comprising almost 2.5k titles. We evaluate all models using human and automatic metrics. Our human evaluation suggests that our best end-to-end system performs similarly to human authors (but arguably slightly worse). Generating funny titles is more difficult, however, and our automatic systems clearly underperform relative to humans and often learn dataset artefacts of humor. Finally, ChatGPT, without any fine-tuning, performs on the level of our best fine-tuned system.

大型语言模型（LLM）已在一系列自然语言理解任务上实现了最先进的表现。但是，这些LLM可能依靠数据集偏差和文物作为预测的快捷方式。这极大地损害了他们的分布（OOD）概括和对抗性鲁棒性。在本文中，我们对最新发展的综述，这些发展解决了LLMS的鲁棒性挑战。我们首先介绍LLM的概念和鲁棒性挑战。然后，我们介绍了在LLM中识别快捷方式学习行为的方法，表征了快捷方式学习的原因以及引入缓解解决方案。最后，我们确定了关键挑战，并将这一研究线的联系引入其他方向。

本文探讨了提高语言模型的零次学习能力的简单方法。我们表明，指令调整 - 通过对说明书中所述的任务集合微调语言模型 - 大幅提升零射门上看不见任务中的表现。我们采取预训练的语言模型和指令调整它通过自然语言指令模板语言表达了60NLP任务137B参数。我们评估这种指令调整模型，我们称之为FLAN，在看不见的任务类型。FLAN显着改善其未修饰的对应的性能和超过25的20个任务，我们评估零射门175BGPT-3。FLAN甚至GPT-3通过在安利，RTE，BoolQ，AI2-ARC，OpenbookQA和StoryCloze大比分胜过几拍。消融研究显示任务和模型的规模，这个数字是指令调整取得成功的关键组成部分。

Conceptual knowledge is fundamental to human cognition and knowledge bases. However, existing knowledge probing works only focus on evaluating factual knowledge of pre-trained language models (PLMs) and ignore conceptual knowledge. Since conceptual knowledge often appears as implicit commonsense behind texts, designing probes for conceptual knowledge is hard. Inspired by knowledge representation schemata, we comprehensively evaluate conceptual knowledge of PLMs by designing three tasks to probe whether PLMs organize entities by conceptual similarities, learn conceptual properties, and conceptualize entities in contexts, respectively. For the tasks, we collect and annotate 24k data instances covering 393 concepts, which is COPEN, a COnceptual knowledge Probing bENchmark. Extensive experiments on different sizes and types of PLMs show that existing PLMs systematically lack conceptual knowledge and suffer from various spurious correlations. We believe this is a critical bottleneck for realizing human-like cognition in PLMs. COPEN and our codes are publicly released at https://github.com/THU-KEG/COPEN.

We show that large pre-trained language models are inherently highly capable of identifying label errors in natural language datasets: simply examining out-of-sample data points in descending order of fine-tuned task loss significantly outperforms more complex error-detection mechanisms proposed in previous work. To this end, we contribute a novel method for introducing realistic, human-originated label noise into existing crowdsourced datasets such as SNLI and TweetNLP. We show that this noise has similar properties to real, hand-verified label errors, and is harder to detect than existing synthetic noise, creating challenges for model robustness. We argue that human-originated noise is a better standard for evaluation than synthetic noise. Finally, we use crowdsourced verification to evaluate the detection of real errors on IMDB, Amazon Reviews, and Recon, and confirm that pre-trained models perform at a 9-36% higher absolute Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve than existing models.

众包NLP数据集的反复挑战是，在制作示例时，人类作家通常会依靠重复的模式，从而导致缺乏语言多样性。我们介绍了一种基于工人和AI协作的数据集创建的新方法，该方法汇集了语言模型的生成力量和人类的评估力量。从现有的数据集，自然语言推理（NLI）的Multinli开始，我们的方法使用数据集制图自动识别示例来证明具有挑战性的推理模式，并指示GPT-3撰写具有相似模式的新示例。然后，机器生成的示例会自动过滤，并最终由人类人群工人修订和标记。最终的数据集Wanli由107,885个NLI示例组成，并在现有的NLI数据集上呈现出独特的经验优势。值得注意的是，培训有关Wanli的模型，而不是Multinli（$ 4 $ $倍）可改善我们考虑的七个外域测试集的性能，包括汉斯（Hans）的11％和对抗性NLI的9％。此外，将Multinli与Wanli结合起来比将其与其他NLI增强集相结合更有效。我们的结果表明，自然语言生成技术的潜力是策划增强质量和多样性的NLP数据集。

This paper investigates models of event implications. Specifically, how well models predict entity state-changes, by targeting their understanding of physical attributes. Nominally, Large Language models (LLM) have been exposed to procedural knowledge about how objects interact, yet our benchmarking shows they fail to reason about the world. Conversely, we also demonstrate that existing approaches often misrepresent the surprising abilities of LLMs via improper task encodings and that proper model prompting can dramatically improve performance of reported baseline results across multiple tasks. In particular, our results indicate that our prompting technique is especially useful for unseen attributes (out-of-domain) or when only limited data is available.