在智能辅导系统中生成提示的现有工作（ITS）主要集中在手动和非个人反馈上。在这项工作中，我们探索了ITS中的个性化反馈作为个性化反馈。我们的个性化反馈可以在学生答案中查明正确，错误或缺失的短语，并通过提出自然语言问题来指导他们正确答案。我们的方法结合了因果分析，以使用基于文本相似性的NLP变压器模型来分解学生答案，以识别正确和不正确或缺失的零件。我们培训了一些弹药的神经问题生成和问题重新排序模型，以显示解决学生答案中缺少的组件的问题，这些组件使学生朝着正确的答案迈进。在基于真实对话的ITS测试时，我们的模型在学生学习的增长方面大大优于简单和强大的基线。最后，我们表明我们个性化的纠正反馈系统有可能改善生成的问答系统。

寻求健康信息的寻求使网络与消费者的健康相关问题淹没了。通常，消费者使用过度描述性和外围信息来表达其医疗状况或其他医疗保健需求，从而有助于自然语言理解的挑战。解决这一挑战的一种方法是总结问题并提取原始问题的关键信息。为了解决此问题，我们介绍了一个新的数据集CHQ-SUMM，其中包含1507个域 - 专家注释的消费者健康问题和相应的摘要。该数据集源自社区提问论坛，因此为了解社交媒体上与消费者健康相关的帖子提供了宝贵的资源。我们在多个最先进的摘要模型上基准测试数据集，以显示数据集的有效性。

人类在对话中提出的问题通常包含上下文依赖性，即对先前对话转弯的明确或隐式引用。这些依赖性采用核心发挥的形式（例如，通过代词使用）或椭圆形，并且可以使自动化系统的理解难以理解。促进对问题的理解和后续治疗方法的一种方法是将其重写为不受欢迎的形式，即可以理解的形式而没有对话性上下文。我们提出了Coqar，Coqar是一种语料库，其中包含$ 4.5 $ k的对话中的对话询问数据集COQA，总计$ 53 $ K的后续提问 - 答案对。每个原始问题都在至少2个脱离台面重写中手动注释。 COQAR可用于监督三个任务的监督：问题释义，问题重写和会话问题回答。为了评估Coqar重写的质量，我们进行了几项实验，包括培训和评估这三个任务的模型。我们的结果支持以下想法：问题重写可以用作问题回答模型的预处理步骤，从而提高其性能。

Powerful generative models have led to recent progress in question generation (QG). However, it is difficult to measure advances in QG research since there are no standardized resources that allow a uniform comparison among approaches. In this paper, we introduce QG-Bench, a multilingual and multidomain benchmark for QG that unifies existing question answering datasets by converting them to a standard QG setting. It includes general-purpose datasets such as SQuAD for English, datasets from ten domains and two styles, as well as datasets in eight different languages. Using QG-Bench as a reference, we perform an extensive analysis of the capabilities of language models for the task. First, we propose robust QG baselines based on fine-tuning generative language models. Then, we complement automatic evaluation based on standard metrics with an extensive manual evaluation, which in turn sheds light on the difficulty of evaluating QG models. Finally, we analyse both the domain adaptability of these models as well as the effectiveness of multilingual models in languages other than English. QG-Bench is released along with the fine-tuned models presented in the paper https://github.com/asahi417/lm-question-generation, which are also available as a demo https://autoqg.net/.

大型语言模型可以产生流畅的对话，但往往是幻觉的事实不准确。虽然检索式增强的模型有助于缓解这个问题，但他们仍然面临着推理的艰难挑战，以便同时提供正确的知识和产生对话。在这项工作中，我们提出了一种模块化模型，知识响应（K2R），将知识纳入会话代理商，这将这个问题分解为两个更简单的步骤。 K2R首先生成一个知识序列，给定对话背景作为中间步骤。在此“推理步骤”之后，该模型随后参加自己生成的知识序列，以及对话背景，以产生最终的响应。在详细的实验中，我们发现这种模型在知识接地的对话任务中少幻觉，并且在可解释性和模块化方面具有优势。特别地，它可以用来将QA和对话系统一起融合在一起，以使对话代理能够提供知识渊博的答案，或者QA模型，以在零拍摄设置中给出对话响应。

Existing metrics for evaluating the quality of automatically generated questions such as BLEU, ROUGE, BERTScore, and BLEURT compare the reference and predicted questions, providing a high score when there is a considerable lexical overlap or semantic similarity between the candidate and the reference questions. This approach has two major shortcomings. First, we need expensive human-provided reference questions. Second, it penalises valid questions that may not have high lexical or semantic similarity to the reference questions. In this paper, we propose a new metric, RQUGE, based on the answerability of the candidate question given the context. The metric consists of a question-answering and a span scorer module, in which we use pre-trained models from the existing literature, and therefore, our metric can be used without further training. We show that RQUGE has a higher correlation with human judgment without relying on the reference question. RQUGE is shown to be significantly more robust to several adversarial corruptions. Additionally, we illustrate that we can significantly improve the performance of QA models on out-of-domain datasets by fine-tuning on the synthetic data generated by a question generation model and re-ranked by RQUGE.

在有问题的回答需要常识的问题上，语言模型（例如，GPT-3）已用于生成表达有助于提高性能的背景知识的文本。然而，使用此类模型的成本很高。在这项工作中，我们对较小的语言模型产生有用的中间上下文，此处称为阐述。我们的框架在更新两个语言模型之间交替使用 - 阐述生成器和一个答案预测变量 - 允许每个语言都影响彼此。我们的模型使用少于GPT-3的参数的0.5％优于具有相似尺寸的替代方案，并在四个常识性问题上回答基准测试的GPT-3上的差距缩小。人类评估表明，生成的阐述的质量很高。

为了实现长文档理解的构建和测试模型，我们引入质量，具有中文段的多项选择QA DataSet，具有约5,000个令牌的平均长度，比典型的当前模型更长。与经过段落的事先工作不同，我们的问题是由阅读整个段落的贡献者编写和验证的，而不是依赖摘要或摘录。此外，只有一半的问题是通过在紧缩时间限制下工作的注释器来应答，表明略读和简单的搜索不足以一直表现良好。目前的模型在此任务上表现不佳（55.4％），并且落后于人类性能（93.5％）。

Precisely assessing the progress in natural language generation (NLG) tasks is challenging, and human evaluation to establish a preference in a model's output over another is often necessary. However, human evaluation is usually costly, difficult to reproduce, and non-reusable. In this paper, we propose a new and simple automatic evaluation method for NLG called Near-Negative Distinction (NND) that repurposes prior human annotations into NND tests. In an NND test, an NLG model must place a higher likelihood on a high-quality output candidate than on a near-negative candidate with a known error. Model performance is established by the number of NND tests a model passes, as well as the distribution over task-specific errors the model fails on. Through experiments on three NLG tasks (question generation, question answering, and summarization), we show that NND achieves a higher correlation with human judgments than standard NLG evaluation metrics. We then illustrate NND evaluation in four practical scenarios, for example performing fine-grain model analysis, or studying model training dynamics. Our findings suggest that NND can give a second life to human annotations and provide low-cost NLG evaluation.

There are many potential benefits to news readers accessing diverse sources. Modern news aggregators do the hard work of organizing the news, offering readers a plethora of source options, but choosing which source to read remains challenging. We propose a new framework to assist readers in identifying source differences and gaining an understanding of news coverage diversity. The framework is based on the generation of Discord Questions: questions with a diverse answer pool, explicitly illustrating source differences. To assemble a prototype of the framework, we focus on two components: (1) discord question generation, the task of generating questions answered differently by sources, for which we propose an automatic scoring method, and create a model that improves performance from current question generation (QG) methods by 5%, (2) answer consolidation, the task of grouping answers to a question that are semantically similar, for which we collect data and repurpose a method that achieves 81% balanced accuracy on our realistic test set. We illustrate the framework's feasibility through a prototype interface. Even though model performance at discord QG still lags human performance by more than 15%, generated questions are judged to be more interesting than factoid questions and can reveal differences in the level of detail, sentiment, and reasoning of sources in news coverage.

Context is vital for commonsense moral reasoning. "Lying to a friend" is wrong if it is meant to deceive them, but may be morally okay if it is intended to protect them. Such nuanced but salient contextual information can potentially flip the moral judgment of an action. Thus, we present ClarifyDelphi, an interactive system that elicits missing contexts of a moral situation by generating clarification questions such as "Why did you lie to your friend?". Our approach is inspired by the observation that questions whose potential answers lead to diverging moral judgments are the most informative. We learn to generate questions using Reinforcement Learning, by maximizing the divergence between moral judgements of hypothetical answers to a question. Human evaluation shows that our system generates more relevant, informative and defeasible questions compared to other question generation baselines. ClarifyDelphi assists informed moral reasoning processes by seeking additional morally consequential context to disambiguate social and moral situations.

Large pre-trained language models have recently enabled open-ended generation frameworks (e.g., prompt-to-text NLG) to tackle a variety of tasks going beyond the traditional data-to-text generation. While this framework is more general, it is under-specified and often leads to a lack of controllability restricting their real-world usage. We propose a new grounded keys-to-text generation task: the task is to generate a factual description about an entity given a set of guiding keys, and grounding passages. To address this task, we introduce a new dataset, called EntDeGen. Inspired by recent QA-based evaluation measures, we propose an automatic metric, MAFE, for factual correctness of generated descriptions. Our EntDescriptor model is equipped with strong rankers to fetch helpful passages and generate entity descriptions. Experimental result shows a good correlation (60.14) between our proposed metric and human judgments of factuality. Our rankers significantly improved the factual correctness of generated descriptions (15.95% and 34.51% relative gains in recall and precision). Finally, our ablation study highlights the benefit of combining keys and groundings.

As large language models (LLMs) grow larger and more sophisticated, assessing their "reasoning" capabilities in natural language grows more challenging. Recent question answering (QA) benchmarks that attempt to assess reasoning are often limited by a narrow scope of covered situations and subject matters. We introduce WikiWhy, a QA dataset built around a novel auxiliary task: explaining why an answer is true in natural language. WikiWhy contains over 9,000 "why" question-answer-rationale triples, grounded on Wikipedia facts across a diverse set of topics. Each rationale is a set of supporting statements connecting the question to the answer. WikiWhy serves as a benchmark for the reasoning capabilities of LLMs because it demands rigorous explicit rationales for each answer to demonstrate the acquisition of implicit commonsense knowledge, which is unlikely to be easily memorized. GPT-3 baselines achieve only 38.7% human-evaluated correctness in the end-to-end answer & explain condition, leaving significant room for future improvements.

Large pre-trained language models have been shown to store factual knowledge in their parameters, and achieve state-of-the-art results when fine-tuned on downstream NLP tasks. However, their ability to access and precisely manipulate knowledge is still limited, and hence on knowledge-intensive tasks, their performance lags behind task-specific architectures. Additionally, providing provenance for their decisions and updating their world knowledge remain open research problems. Pre-trained models with a differentiable access mechanism to explicit nonparametric memory can overcome this issue, but have so far been only investigated for extractive downstream tasks. We explore a general-purpose fine-tuning recipe for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) -models which combine pre-trained parametric and non-parametric memory for language generation. We introduce RAG models where the parametric memory is a pre-trained seq2seq model and the non-parametric memory is a dense vector index of Wikipedia, accessed with a pre-trained neural retriever. We compare two RAG formulations, one which conditions on the same retrieved passages across the whole generated sequence, and another which can use different passages per token. We fine-tune and evaluate our models on a wide range of knowledge-intensive NLP tasks and set the state of the art on three open domain QA tasks, outperforming parametric seq2seq models and task-specific retrieve-and-extract architectures. For language generation tasks, we find that RAG models generate more specific, diverse and factual language than a state-of-the-art parametric-only seq2seq baseline.

我们介绍了一个新的数据集，以通过口头答案对知识图（kgs）回答对话问题。目前，关于KGS的问题回答是针对单转问题的答案（KGQA）或多型对话对话问题答案（Convqa）。但是，在现实情况下（例如，Siri，Alexa和Google Assistant等语音助手），用户更喜欢口头上的答案。本文通过将现有的ConvQA数据集扩展到具有多种释义的言语答案，从而为最先进的方法做出了贡献。我们使用五个序列到序列模型进行实验，以生成答案响应，同时保持语法正确性。我们还执行错误分析，该分析详细介绍了模型在指定类别中的错误预测率。我们提出的随着答案语言扩展的数据集可公开使用，其中包含有关其更广泛用途的使用的详细文档。

Natural Language Generation (NLG) has improved exponentially in recent years thanks to the development of sequence-to-sequence deep learning technologies such as Transformer-based language models. This advancement has led to more fluent and coherent NLG, leading to improved development in downstream tasks such as abstractive summarization, dialogue generation and data-to-text generation. However, it is also apparent that deep learning based generation is prone to hallucinate unintended text, which degrades the system performance and fails to meet user expectations in many real-world scenarios. To address this issue, many studies have been presented in measuring and mitigating hallucinated texts, but these have never been reviewed in a comprehensive manner before. In this survey, we thus provide a broad overview of the research progress and challenges in the hallucination problem in NLG. The survey is organized into two parts: (1) a general overview of metrics, mitigation methods, and future directions; and (2) an overview of task-specific research progress on hallucinations in the following downstream tasks, namely abstractive summarization, dialogue generation, generative question answering, data-to-text generation, machine translation, and visual-language generation. This survey serves to facilitate collaborative efforts among researchers in tackling the challenge of hallucinated texts in NLG.

大型语言模型越来越能够通过相对较少的特定任务的监督产生流畅的出现文本。但这些模型可以准确解释分类决策吗？我们考虑使用少量人写的例子（即，以几滴方式）生成自由文本解释的任务。我们发现（1）创作更高质量的例子，以提示导致更高质量的世代; （2）令人惊讶的是，在头到头比较中，人群公司通常更喜欢GPT-3生成的解释，以众包中包含的人性写入的解释。然而，Crowdworker评级也表明，虽然模型产生了事实，语法和充分的解释，但它们具有改进的空间，例如沿着提供新颖信息和支持标签的轴。我们创建了一种管道，该管道将GPT-3与监督过滤器结合起来，该过滤器通过二进制可接受性判断来包含人类循环。尽管具有重要的主观性内在的判断可接受性，但我们的方法能够始终如一地过滤人类可接受的GPT-3生成的解释。

Large language models show improved downstream task performance when prompted to generate step-by-step reasoning to justify their final answers. These reasoning steps greatly improve model interpretability and verification, but objectively studying their correctness (independent of the final answer) is difficult without reliable methods for automatic evaluation. We simply do not know how often the stated reasoning steps actually support the final end task predictions. In this work, we present ROSCOE, a suite of interpretable, unsupervised automatic scores that improve and extend previous text generation evaluation metrics. To evaluate ROSCOE against baseline metrics, we design a typology of reasoning errors and collect synthetic and human evaluation scores on commonly used reasoning datasets. In contrast with existing metrics, ROSCOE can measure semantic consistency, logicality, informativeness, fluency, and factuality - among other traits - by leveraging properties of step-by-step rationales. We empirically verify the strength of our metrics on five human annotated and six programmatically perturbed diagnostics datasets - covering a diverse set of tasks that require reasoning skills and show that ROSCOE can consistently outperform baseline metrics.

自动问题应答（QA）系统的目的是以时间有效的方式向用户查询提供答案。通常在数据库（或知识库）或通常被称为语料库的文件集合中找到答案。在过去的几十年里，收购知识的扩散，因此生物医学领域的新科学文章一直是指数增长。因此，即使对于领域专家，也难以跟踪域中的所有信息。随着商业搜索引擎的改进，用户可以在某些情况下键入其查询并获得最相关的一小组文档，以及在某些情况下从文档中的相关片段。但是，手动查找所需信息或答案可能仍然令人疑惑和耗时。这需要开发高效的QA系统，该系统旨在为用户提供精确和精确的答案提供了生物医学领域的自然语言问题。在本文中，我们介绍了用于开发普通域QA系统的基本方法，然后彻底调查生物医学QA系统的不同方面，包括使用结构化数据库和文本集合的基准数据集和几种提出的方​​法。我们还探讨了当前系统的局限性，并探索潜在的途径以获得进一步的进步。

Question Answering (QA) is a growing area of research, often used to facilitate the extraction of information from within documents. State-of-the-art QA models are usually pre-trained on domain-general corpora like Wikipedia and thus tend to struggle on out-of-domain documents without fine-tuning. We demonstrate that synthetic domain-specific datasets can be generated easily using domain-general models, while still providing significant improvements to QA performance. We present two new tools for this task: A flexible pipeline for validating the synthetic QA data and training downstream models on it, and an online interface to facilitate human annotation of this generated data. Using this interface, crowdworkers labelled 1117 synthetic QA pairs, which we then used to fine-tune downstream models and improve domain-specific QA performance by 8.75 F1.