人类在对话中提出的问题通常包含上下文依赖性，即对先前对话转弯的明确或隐式引用。这些依赖性采用核心发挥的形式（例如，通过代词使用）或椭圆形，并且可以使自动化系统的理解难以理解。促进对问题的理解和后续治疗方法的一种方法是将其重写为不受欢迎的形式，即可以理解的形式而没有对话性上下文。我们提出了Coqar，Coqar是一种语料库，其中包含$ 4.5 $ k的对话中的对话询问数据集COQA，总计$ 53 $ K的后续提问 - 答案对。每个原始问题都在至少2个脱离台面重写中手动注释。 COQAR可用于监督三个任务的监督：问题释义，问题重写和会话问题回答。为了评估Coqar重写的质量，我们进行了几项实验，包括培训和评估这三个任务的模型。我们的结果支持以下想法：问题重写可以用作问题回答模型的预处理步骤，从而提高其性能。

Powerful generative models have led to recent progress in question generation (QG). However, it is difficult to measure advances in QG research since there are no standardized resources that allow a uniform comparison among approaches. In this paper, we introduce QG-Bench, a multilingual and multidomain benchmark for QG that unifies existing question answering datasets by converting them to a standard QG setting. It includes general-purpose datasets such as SQuAD for English, datasets from ten domains and two styles, as well as datasets in eight different languages. Using QG-Bench as a reference, we perform an extensive analysis of the capabilities of language models for the task. First, we propose robust QG baselines based on fine-tuning generative language models. Then, we complement automatic evaluation based on standard metrics with an extensive manual evaluation, which in turn sheds light on the difficulty of evaluating QG models. Finally, we analyse both the domain adaptability of these models as well as the effectiveness of multilingual models in languages other than English. QG-Bench is released along with the fine-tuned models presented in the paper https://github.com/asahi417/lm-question-generation, which are also available as a demo https://autoqg.net/.

我们介绍了Godel（接地开放对话语言模型），这是对话框的大型预训练的语言模型。与诸如Dialogpt之类的早期模型相比，Godel利用了一个新的扎根预训练阶段，旨在更好地支持将Godel适应广泛的下游对话框任务，这些任务需要当前对话外部的信息（例如，数据库或文档）到产生良好的回应。针对一系列基准测试的实验，这些基准涵盖了面向任务的对话框，对话质量质量检查和接地的开放式对话框，表明Godel在几次以上的微调设置中优于最先进的预训练的对话模型，就人类和自动评估。我们评估方法的一个新颖特征是引入了一个效用概念，该概念除了其交流特征（内在评估）外，还评估了响应的有用性（外部评估）。我们表明，外部评估提供了改进的通道间一致性和与自动指标的相关性。代码和数据处理脚本公开可用。

Humans gather information through conversations involving a series of interconnected questions and answers. For machines to assist in information gathering, it is therefore essential to enable them to answer conversational questions. We introduce CoQA, a novel dataset for building Conversational Question Answering systems. 1 Our dataset contains 127k questions with answers, obtained from 8k conversations about text passages from seven diverse domains. The questions are conversational, and the answers are free-form text with their corresponding evidence highlighted in the passage. We analyze CoQA in depth and show that conversational questions have challenging phenomena not present in existing reading comprehension datasets, e.g., coreference and pragmatic reasoning. We evaluate strong dialogue and reading comprehension models on CoQA. The best system obtains an F1 score of 65.4%, which is 23.4 points behind human performance (88.8%), indicating there is ample room for improvement. We present CoQA as a challenge to the community at https://stanfordnlp. github.io/coqa.

Question Answering (QA) is a growing area of research, often used to facilitate the extraction of information from within documents. State-of-the-art QA models are usually pre-trained on domain-general corpora like Wikipedia and thus tend to struggle on out-of-domain documents without fine-tuning. We demonstrate that synthetic domain-specific datasets can be generated easily using domain-general models, while still providing significant improvements to QA performance. We present two new tools for this task: A flexible pipeline for validating the synthetic QA data and training downstream models on it, and an online interface to facilitate human annotation of this generated data. Using this interface, crowdworkers labelled 1117 synthetic QA pairs, which we then used to fine-tune downstream models and improve domain-specific QA performance by 8.75 F1.

The General QA field has been developing the methodology referencing the Stanford Question answering dataset (SQuAD) as the significant benchmark. However, compiling factual questions is accompanied by time- and labour-consuming annotation, limiting the training data's potential size. We present the WikiOmnia dataset, a new publicly available set of QA-pairs and corresponding Russian Wikipedia article summary sections, composed with a fully automated generative pipeline. The dataset includes every available article from Wikipedia for the Russian language. The WikiOmnia pipeline is available open-source and is also tested for creating SQuAD-formatted QA on other domains, like news texts, fiction, and social media. The resulting dataset includes two parts: raw data on the whole Russian Wikipedia (7,930,873 QA pairs with paragraphs for ruGPT-3 XL and 7,991,040 QA pairs with paragraphs for ruT5-large) and cleaned data with strict automatic verification (over 160,000 QA pairs with paragraphs for ruGPT-3 XL and over 3,400,000 QA pairs with paragraphs for ruT5-large).

在智能辅导系统中生成提示的现有工作（ITS）主要集中在手动和非个人反馈上。在这项工作中，我们探索了ITS中的个性化反馈作为个性化反馈。我们的个性化反馈可以在学生答案中查明正确，错误或缺失的短语，并通过提出自然语言问题来指导他们正确答案。我们的方法结合了因果分析，以使用基于文本相似性的NLP变压器模型来分解学生答案，以识别正确和不正确或缺失的零件。我们培训了一些弹药的神经问题生成和问题重新排序模型，以显示解决学生答案中缺少的组件的问题，这些组件使学生朝着正确的答案迈进。在基于真实对话的ITS测试时，我们的模型在学生学习的增长方面大大优于简单和强大的基线。最后，我们表明我们个性化的纠正反馈系统有可能改善生成的问答系统。

大型语言模型可以产生流畅的对话，但往往是幻觉的事实不准确。虽然检索式增强的模型有助于缓解这个问题，但他们仍然面临着推理的艰难挑战，以便同时提供正确的知识和产生对话。在这项工作中，我们提出了一种模块化模型，知识响应（K2R），将知识纳入会话代理商，这将这个问题分解为两个更简单的步骤。 K2R首先生成一个知识序列，给定对话背景作为中间步骤。在此“推理步骤”之后，该模型随后参加自己生成的知识序列，以及对话背景，以产生最终的响应。在详细的实验中，我们发现这种模型在知识接地的对话任务中少幻觉，并且在可解释性和模块化方面具有优势。特别地，它可以用来将QA和对话系统一起融合在一起，以使对话代理能够提供知识渊博的答案，或者QA模型，以在零拍摄设置中给出对话响应。

Knowledge-grounded dialogue systems powered by large language models often generate responses that, while fluent, are not attributable to a relevant source of information. Progress towards models that do not exhibit this issue requires evaluation metrics that can quantify its prevalence. To this end, we introduce the Benchmark for Evaluation of Grounded INteraction (BEGIN), comprised of 12k dialogue turns generated by neural dialogue systems trained on three knowledgegrounded dialogue corpora. We collect human annotations assessing the extent to which the models' responses can be attributed to the given background information. We then use BEGIN to analyze eight evaluation metrics. We find that these metrics rely on spurious correlations, do not reliably distinguish attributable abstractive responses from unattributable ones, and perform substantially worse when the knowledge source is longer. Our findings underscore the need for more sophisticated and robust evaluation metrics for knowledge-grounded dialogue. We make BEGIN publicly available at https://github.com/ google/BEGIN-dataset.

问题回答（QA）是信息检索和信息提取领域内的一项自然理解任务，由于基于机器阅读理解的模型的强劲发展，近年来，近年来，近年来的计算语言学和人工智能研究社区引起了很多关注。基于读者的质量检查系统是一种高级搜索引擎，可以使用机器阅读理解（MRC）技术在开放域或特定领域特定文本中找到正确的查询或问题的答案。 MRC和QA系统中的数据资源和机器学习方法的大多数进步尤其是在两种资源丰富的语言中显着开发的，例如英语和中文。像越南人这样的低资源语言见证了关于质量检查系统的稀缺研究。本文介绍了XLMRQA，这是第一个在基于Wikipedia的文本知识源（使用UIT-Viquad语料库）上使用基于变压器的读取器的越南质量检查系统，使用深​​层神经网络模型优于DRQA和BERTSERINI，优于两个可靠的QA系统分别为24.46％和6.28％。从三个系统获得的结果中，我们分析了问题类型对质量检查系统性能的影响。

Quality management and assurance is key for space agencies to guarantee the success of space missions, which are high-risk and extremely costly. In this paper, we present a system to generate quizzes, a common resource to evaluate the effectiveness of training sessions, from documents about quality assurance procedures in the Space domain. Our system leverages state of the art auto-regressive models like T5 and BART to generate questions, and a RoBERTa model to extract answers for such questions, thus verifying their suitability.

在宣传，新闻和社交媒体中的虚假，不准确和误导信息中，现实世界的问题应答（QA）系统面临综合和推理相互矛盾的挑战，以获得正确答案的挑战。这种紧迫性导致需要使QA系统对错误信息的强大，这是一个先前未开发的主题。我们通过调查与实际和虚假信息混合的矛盾的情况下，通过调查QA模型的行为来研究对QA模型的错误信息的风险。我们为此问题创建了第一个大规模数据集，即对QA，其中包含超过10K的人写和模型生成的矛盾的上下文。实验表明，QA模型易受误导的背景下的攻击。为了防御这种威胁，我们建立一个错误信息感知的QA系统作为一个反措施，可以以联合方式整合问题应答和错误信息检测。

实际一致性是实际设置中文本摘要模型的基本质量。在评估此维度的现有工作可以大致分为两行研究，基于征收的指标和问题应答（QA）的指标。然而，最近作品中提出的不同的实验设置导致对比的结论是哪个范例表现最佳。在这项工作中，我们进行了广泛的征集和基于QA的指标的比较，致力于仔细选择基于QA的度量的组件对于性能至关重要。在那些见解中，我们提出了一个优化的公制，我们称之为QAFacteval，这导致了对夏季事实一致性基准的基于QA的度量标准的平均平均平均改进。我们的解决方案提高了基于最佳的基于范围的公制，并在该基准测试中实现了最先进的性能。此外，我们发现基于QA和基于征求的度量提供了互补信号，并将两者组合成单个学习的度量，以进一步提升。通过定性和定量分析，我们将问题生成和可应答性分类视为基于QA的度量的未来工作的两个关键组成部分。

There are many potential benefits to news readers accessing diverse sources. Modern news aggregators do the hard work of organizing the news, offering readers a plethora of source options, but choosing which source to read remains challenging. We propose a new framework to assist readers in identifying source differences and gaining an understanding of news coverage diversity. The framework is based on the generation of Discord Questions: questions with a diverse answer pool, explicitly illustrating source differences. To assemble a prototype of the framework, we focus on two components: (1) discord question generation, the task of generating questions answered differently by sources, for which we propose an automatic scoring method, and create a model that improves performance from current question generation (QG) methods by 5%, (2) answer consolidation, the task of grouping answers to a question that are semantically similar, for which we collect data and repurpose a method that achieves 81% balanced accuracy on our realistic test set. We illustrate the framework's feasibility through a prototype interface. Even though model performance at discord QG still lags human performance by more than 15%, generated questions are judged to be more interesting than factoid questions and can reveal differences in the level of detail, sentiment, and reasoning of sources in news coverage.

由于人类参与者的参与，收集培训对话系统的数据可能非常昂贵，并且需要广泛的注释。特别是在文档接地的对话系统中，人类专家需要仔细阅读非结构化文件以回答用户的问题。结果，现有的文档接地对话对话数据集相对较小，并且妨碍了对话系统的有效培训。在本文中，我们提出了一种通过生成对话模型在文档上接地的自动数据增强技术。对话模型由用户BOT和代理机器人组成，可以在给定输入文档的情况下合成不同的对话，然后用于训练下游模型。在补充原始数据集时，我们的方法可以实现对传统数据增强方法的显着改进。我们还在低资源环境中实现了良好的性能。

对于开放式对话问题应答（CQA），可以检索最相关的段落来回答问题，但与标准通道检索相比，这是具有挑战性，因为它需要了解完整的对话背景而不是单个查询。此外，重新列车良好的检索者（例如用于非对话查询）最初开发的搜索引擎都可以昂贵。为了便于他们的使用，我们开发了一个查询重写模型Conqrr，可以将上下文中的会话问题重写为独立的问题。它培训了一种新颖的奖励功能，可以直接优化检索，并且可以使用强化学习来适应任何固定的黑箱猎犬。我们展示了Conqrr在最近的开放式CQA数据集上实现了最先进的结果，这是来自三个不同来源的对话组合。我们还开展了广泛的实验，以表明CONQRR为任何给定的固定猎犬的有效性。

Large pre-trained language models have recently enabled open-ended generation frameworks (e.g., prompt-to-text NLG) to tackle a variety of tasks going beyond the traditional data-to-text generation. While this framework is more general, it is under-specified and often leads to a lack of controllability restricting their real-world usage. We propose a new grounded keys-to-text generation task: the task is to generate a factual description about an entity given a set of guiding keys, and grounding passages. To address this task, we introduce a new dataset, called EntDeGen. Inspired by recent QA-based evaluation measures, we propose an automatic metric, MAFE, for factual correctness of generated descriptions. Our EntDescriptor model is equipped with strong rankers to fetch helpful passages and generate entity descriptions. Experimental result shows a good correlation (60.14) between our proposed metric and human judgments of factuality. Our rankers significantly improved the factual correctness of generated descriptions (15.95% and 34.51% relative gains in recall and precision). Finally, our ablation study highlights the benefit of combining keys and groundings.

有关应答数据集和模型的研究在研究界中获得了很多关注。其中许多人释放了自己的问题应答数据集以及模型。我们在该研究领域看到了巨大的进展。本调查的目的是识别，总结和分析许多研究人员释放的现有数据集，尤其是在非英语数据集以及研究代码和评估指标等资源中。在本文中，我们审查了问题应答数据集，这些数据集可以以法语，德语，日语，中文，阿拉伯语，俄语以及多语言和交叉的问答数据集进行英语。

This paper addresses the quality issues in existing Twitter-based paraphrase datasets, and discusses the necessity of using two separate definitions of paraphrase for identification and generation tasks. We present a new Multi-Topic Paraphrase in Twitter (MultiPIT) corpus that consists of a total of 130k sentence pairs with crowdsoursing (MultiPIT_crowd) and expert (MultiPIT_expert) annotations using two different paraphrase definitions for paraphrase identification, in addition to a multi-reference test set (MultiPIT_NMR) and a large automatically constructed training set (MultiPIT_Auto) for paraphrase generation. With improved data annotation quality and task-specific paraphrase definition, the best pre-trained language model fine-tuned on our dataset achieves the state-of-the-art performance of 84.2 F1 for automatic paraphrase identification. Furthermore, our empirical results also demonstrate that the paraphrase generation models trained on MultiPIT_Auto generate more diverse and high-quality paraphrases compared to their counterparts fine-tuned on other corpora such as Quora, MSCOCO, and ParaNMT.

预审前的语言模型通过提供高质量的上下文化单词嵌入来显着改善了下游语言理解任务（包括提取性问题）的性能。但是，培训问答模型仍然需要大量特定域的注释数据。在这项工作中，我们提出了一个合作的自我训练框架RGX，用于自动生成更非平凡的问题 - 解答对以提高模型性能。 RGX建立在带有答案实体识别器，问题生成器和答案提取器的交互式学习环境的蒙版答案提取任务上。给定带有蒙版实体的段落，生成器会在实体周围生成一个问题，并培训了提取器，以提取蒙面实体，并使用生成的问题和原始文本。该框架允许对任何文本语料库的问题产生和回答模型进行培训，而无需注释。实验结果表明，RGX优于最先进的语言模型（SOTA）的语言模型，并在标准提问基准的基准上采用转移学习方法，并在给定的模型大小和传输学习设置下产生新的SOTA性能。