深度神经网络众所周知，很容易受到对抗性攻击和后门攻击的影响，在该攻击中，对输入的微小修改能够误导模型以给出错误的结果。尽管已经广泛研究了针对对抗性攻击的防御措施，但有关减轻后门攻击的调查仍处于早期阶段。尚不清楚防御这两次攻击之间是否存在任何连接和共同特征。我们对对抗性示例与深神网络的后门示例之间的联系进行了全面的研究，以寻求回答以下问题：我们可以使用对抗检测方法检测后门。我们的见解是基于这样的观察结果，即在推理过程中，对抗性示例和后门示例都有异常，与良性​​样本高度区分。结果，我们修改了四种现有的对抗防御方法来检测后门示例。广泛的评估表明，这些方法可靠地防止后门攻击，其准确性比检测对抗性实例更高。这些解决方案还揭示了模型灵敏度，激活空间和特征空间中对抗性示例，后门示例和正常样本的关系。这能够增强我们对这两次攻击和防御机会的固有特征的理解。

Although deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved great success in many tasks, they can often be fooled by adversarial examples that are generated by adding small but purposeful distortions to natural examples. Previous studies to defend against adversarial examples mostly focused on refining the DNN models, but have either shown limited success or required expensive computation. We propose a new strategy, feature squeezing, that can be used to harden DNN models by detecting adversarial examples. Feature squeezing reduces the search space available to an adversary by coalescing samples that correspond to many different feature vectors in the original space into a single sample. By comparing a DNN model's prediction on the original input with that on squeezed inputs, feature squeezing detects adversarial examples with high accuracy and few false positives.This paper explores two feature squeezing methods: reducing the color bit depth of each pixel and spatial smoothing. These simple strategies are inexpensive and complementary to other defenses, and can be combined in a joint detection framework to achieve high detection rates against state-of-the-art attacks.

深度神经网络（DNNS）在训练过程中容易受到后门攻击的影响。该模型以这种方式损坏正常起作用，但是当输入中的某些模式触发时，会产生预定义的目标标签。现有防御通常依赖于通用后门设置的假设，其中有毒样品共享相同的均匀扳机。但是，最近的高级后门攻击表明，这种假设在动态后门中不再有效，在动态后门中，触发者因输入而异，从而击败了现有的防御。在这项工作中，我们提出了一种新颖的技术BEATRIX（通过革兰氏矩阵检测）。 BEATRIX利用革兰氏矩阵不仅捕获特征相关性，还可以捕获表示形式的适当高阶信息。通过从正常样本的激活模式中学习类条件统计，BEATRIX可以通过捕获激活模式中的异常来识别中毒样品。为了进一步提高识别目标标签的性能，BEATRIX利用基于内核的测试，而无需对表示分布进行任何先前的假设。我们通过与最先进的防御技术进行了广泛的评估和比较来证明我们的方法的有效性。实验结果表明，我们的方法在检测动态后门时达到了91.1％的F1得分，而最新技术只能达到36.9％。

现代自动驾驶汽车采用最先进的DNN模型来解释传感器数据并感知环境。但是，DNN模型容易受到不同类型的对抗攻击的影响，这对车辆和乘客的安全性和安全性构成了重大风险。一个突出的威胁是后门攻击，对手可以通过中毒训练样本来妥协DNN模型。尽管已经大量精力致力于调查后门攻击对传统的计算机视觉任务，但很少探索其对自主驾驶场景的实用性和适用性，尤其是在物理世界中。在本文中，我们针对车道检测系统，该系统是许多自动驾驶任务，例如导航，车道切换的必不可少的模块。我们设计并实现了对此类系统的第一次物理后门攻击。我们的攻击是针对不同类型的车道检测算法的全面有效的。具体而言，我们引入了两种攻击方法（毒药和清洁量）来生成中毒样本。使用这些样品，训练有素的车道检测模型将被后门感染，并且可以通过公共物体（例如，交通锥）进行启动，以进行错误的检测，导致车辆从道路上或在相反的车道上行驶。对公共数据集和物理自动驾驶汽车的广泛评估表明，我们的后门攻击对各种防御解决方案都是有效，隐秘和强大的。我们的代码和实验视频可以在https://sites.google.com/view/lane-detection-attack/lda中找到。

与令人印象深刻的进步触动了我们社会的各个方面，基于深度神经网络（DNN）的AI技术正在带来越来越多的安全问题。虽然在考试时间运行的攻击垄断了研究人员的初始关注，但是通过干扰培训过程来利用破坏DNN模型的可能性，代表了破坏训练过程的可能性，这是破坏AI技术的可靠性的进一步严重威胁。在后门攻击中，攻击者损坏了培训数据，以便在测试时间诱导错误的行为。然而，测试时间误差仅在存在与正确制作的输入样本对应的触发事件的情况下被激活。通过这种方式，损坏的网络继续正常输入的预期工作，并且只有当攻击者决定激活网络内隐藏的后门时，才会发生恶意行为。在过去几年中，后门攻击一直是强烈的研究活动的主题，重点是新的攻击阶段的发展，以及可能对策的提议。此概述文件的目标是审查发表的作品，直到现在，分类到目前为止提出的不同类型的攻击和防御。指导分析的分类基于攻击者对培训过程的控制量，以及防御者验证用于培训的数据的完整性，并监控DNN在培训和测试中的操作时间。因此，拟议的分析特别适合于参考他们在运营的应用方案的攻击和防御的强度和弱点。

深度学习（DL）在许多与人类相关的任务中表现出巨大的成功，这导致其在许多计算机视觉的基础应用中采用，例如安全监控系统，自治车辆和医疗保健。一旦他们拥有能力克服安全关键挑战，这种安全关键型应用程序必须绘制他们的成功部署之路。在这些挑战中，防止或/和检测对抗性实例（AES）。对手可以仔细制作小型，通常是难以察觉的，称为扰动的噪声被添加到清洁图像中以产生AE。 AE的目的是愚弄DL模型，使其成为DL应用的潜在风险。在文献中提出了许多测试时间逃避攻击和对策，即防御或检测方法。此外，还发布了很少的评论和调查，理论上展示了威胁的分类和对策方法，几乎​​没有焦点检测方法。在本文中，我们专注于图像分类任务，并试图为神经网络分类器进行测试时间逃避攻击检测方法的调查。对此类方法的详细讨论提供了在四个数据集的不同场景下的八个最先进的探测器的实验结果。我们还为这一研究方向提供了潜在的挑战和未来的观点。

With rapid progress and significant successes in a wide spectrum of applications, deep learning is being applied in many safety-critical environments. However, deep neural networks have been recently found vulnerable to well-designed input samples, called adversarial examples. Adversarial perturbations are imperceptible to human but can easily fool deep neural networks in the testing/deploying stage. The vulnerability to adversarial examples becomes one of the major risks for applying deep neural networks in safety-critical environments. Therefore, attacks and defenses on adversarial examples draw great attention. In this paper, we review recent findings on adversarial examples for deep neural networks, summarize the methods for generating adversarial examples, and propose a taxonomy of these methods. Under the taxonomy, applications for adversarial examples are investigated. We further elaborate on countermeasures for adversarial examples. In addition, three major challenges in adversarial examples and the potential solutions are discussed.

在现实世界应用中的深度神经网络（DNN）的成功受益于丰富的预训练模型。然而，回溯预训练模型可以对下游DNN的部署构成显着的特洛伊木马威胁。现有的DNN测试方法主要旨在在对抗性设置中找到错误的角壳行为，但未能发现由强大的木马攻击所制作的后门。观察特洛伊木马网络行为表明，它们不仅由先前的工作所提出的单一受损神经元反射，而且归因于在多个神经元的激活强度和频率中的关键神经路径。这项工作制定了DNN后门测试，并提出了录音机框架。通过少量良性示例的关键神经元的差异模糊，我们识别特洛伊木马路径，特别是临界人，并通过模拟所识别的路径中的关键神经元来产生后门测试示例。广泛的实验表明了追索者的优越性，比现有方法更高的检测性能。通过隐秘的混合和自适应攻击来检测到后门的录音机更好，现有方法无法检测到。此外，我们的实验表明，录音所可能会揭示模型动物园中的模型的潜在潜在的背面。

A recent trojan attack on deep neural network (DNN) models is one insidious variant of data poisoning attacks. Trojan attacks exploit an effective backdoor created in a DNN model by leveraging the difficulty in interpretability of the learned model to misclassify any inputs signed with the attacker's chosen trojan trigger. Since the trojan trigger is a secret guarded and exploited by the attacker, detecting such trojan inputs is a challenge, especially at run-time when models are in active operation. This work builds STRong Intentional Perturbation (STRIP) based run-time trojan attack detection system and focuses on vision system. We intentionally perturb the incoming input, for instance by superimposing various image patterns, and observe the randomness of predicted classes for perturbed inputs from a given deployed model-malicious or benign. A low entropy in predicted classes violates the input-dependence property of a benign model and implies the presence of a malicious input-a characteristic of a trojaned input. The high efficacy of our method is validated through case studies on three popular and contrasting datasets: MNIST, CIFAR10 and GTSRB. We achieve an overall false acceptance rate (FAR) of less than 1%, given a preset false rejection rate (FRR) of 1%, for different types of triggers. Using CIFAR10 and GTSRB, we have empirically achieved result of 0% for both FRR and FAR. We have also evaluated STRIP robustness against a number of trojan attack variants and adaptive attacks.

后门攻击已被证明是对深度学习模型的严重安全威胁，并且检测给定模型是否已成为后门成为至关重要的任务。现有的防御措施主要建立在观察到后门触发器通常尺寸很小或仅影响几个神经元激活的观察结果。但是，在许多情况下，尤其是对于高级后门攻击，违反了上述观察结果，阻碍了现有防御的性能和适用性。在本文中，我们提出了基于新观察的后门防御范围。也就是说，有效的后门攻击通常需要对中毒训练样本的高预测置信度，以确保训练有素的模型具有很高的可能性。基于此观察结果，Dtinspector首先学习一个可以改变最高信心数据的预测的补丁，然后通过检查在低信心数据上应用学习补丁后检查预测变化的比率来决定后门的存在。对五次后门攻击，四个数据集和三种高级攻击类型的广泛评估证明了拟议防御的有效性。

典型的深神经网络（DNN）后门攻击基于输入中嵌入的触发因素。现有的不可察觉的触发因素在计算上昂贵或攻击成功率低。在本文中，我们提出了一个新的后门触发器，该扳机易于生成，不可察觉和高效。新的触发器是一个均匀生成的三维（3D）二进制图案，可以水平和/或垂直重复和镜像，并将其超级贴在三通道图像上，以训练后式DNN模型。新型触发器分散在整个图像中，对单个像素产生微弱的扰动，但共同拥有强大的识别模式来训练和激活DNN的后门。我们还通过分析表明，随着图像的分辨率提高，触发因素越来越有效。实验是使用MNIST，CIFAR-10和BTSR数据集上的RESNET-18和MLP模型进行的。在无遗象的方面，新触发的表现优于现有的触发器，例如Badnet，Trojaned NN和隐藏的后门。新的触发因素达到了几乎100％的攻击成功率，仅将分类准确性降低了不到0.7％-2.4％，并使最新的防御技术无效。

As a critical threat to deep neural networks (DNNs), backdoor attacks can be categorized into two types, i.e., source-agnostic backdoor attacks (SABAs) and source-specific backdoor attacks (SSBAs). Compared to traditional SABAs, SSBAs are more advanced in that they have superior stealthier in bypassing mainstream countermeasures that are effective against SABAs. Nonetheless, existing SSBAs suffer from two major limitations. First, they can hardly achieve a good trade-off between ASR (attack success rate) and FPR (false positive rate). Besides, they can be effectively detected by the state-of-the-art (SOTA) countermeasures (e.g., SCAn). To address the limitations above, we propose a new class of viable source-specific backdoor attacks, coined as CASSOCK. Our key insight is that trigger designs when creating poisoned data and cover data in SSBAs play a crucial role in demonstrating a viable source-specific attack, which has not been considered by existing SSBAs. With this insight, we focus on trigger transparency and content when crafting triggers for poisoned dataset where a sample has an attacker-targeted label and cover dataset where a sample has a ground-truth label. Specifically, we implement $CASSOCK_{Trans}$ and $CASSOCK_{Cont}$. While both they are orthogonal, they are complementary to each other, generating a more powerful attack, called $CASSOCK_{Comp}$, with further improved attack performance and stealthiness. We perform a comprehensive evaluation of the three $CASSOCK$-based attacks on four popular datasets and three SOTA defenses. Compared with a representative SSBA as a baseline ($SSBA_{Base}$), $CASSOCK$-based attacks have significantly advanced the attack performance, i.e., higher ASR and lower FPR with comparable CDA (clean data accuracy). Besides, $CASSOCK$-based attacks have effectively bypassed the SOTA defenses, and $SSBA_{Base}$ cannot.

已知深层神经网络（DNN）容易受到后门攻击和对抗攻击的影响。在文献中，这两种攻击通常被视为明显的问题并分别解决，因为它们分别属于训练时间和推理时间攻击。但是，在本文中，我们发现它们之间有一个有趣的联系：对于具有后门种植的模型，我们观察到其对抗性示例具有与触发样品相似的行为，即都激活了同一DNN神经元的子集。这表明将后门种植到模型中会严重影响模型的对抗性例子。基于这一观察结果，我们设计了一种新的对抗性微调（AFT）算法，以防止后门攻击。我们从经验上表明，在5次最先进的后门攻击中，我们的船尾可以有效地擦除后门触发器，而无需在干净的样品上明显的性能降解，并显着优于现有的防御方法。

Dataset distillation has emerged as a prominent technique to improve data efficiency when training machine learning models. It encapsulates the knowledge from a large dataset into a smaller synthetic dataset. A model trained on this smaller distilled dataset can attain comparable performance to a model trained on the original training dataset. However, the existing dataset distillation techniques mainly aim at achieving the best trade-off between resource usage efficiency and model utility. The security risks stemming from them have not been explored. This study performs the first backdoor attack against the models trained on the data distilled by dataset distillation models in the image domain. Concretely, we inject triggers into the synthetic data during the distillation procedure rather than during the model training stage, where all previous attacks are performed. We propose two types of backdoor attacks, namely NAIVEATTACK and DOORPING. NAIVEATTACK simply adds triggers to the raw data at the initial distillation phase, while DOORPING iteratively updates the triggers during the entire distillation procedure. We conduct extensive evaluations on multiple datasets, architectures, and dataset distillation techniques. Empirical evaluation shows that NAIVEATTACK achieves decent attack success rate (ASR) scores in some cases, while DOORPING reaches higher ASR scores (close to 1.0) in all cases. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive ablation study to analyze the factors that may affect the attack performance. Finally, we evaluate multiple defense mechanisms against our backdoor attacks and show that our attacks can practically circumvent these defense mechanisms.

最近的研究表明，深神经网络（DNN）易受对抗性攻击的影响，包括逃避和后门（中毒）攻击。在防守方面，有密集的努力，改善了对逃避袭击的经验和可怜的稳健性;然而，对后门攻击的可稳健性仍然很大程度上是未开发的。在本文中，我们专注于认证机器学习模型稳健性，反对一般威胁模型，尤其是后门攻击。我们首先通过随机平滑技术提供统一的框架，并展示如何实例化以证明对逃避和后门攻击的鲁棒性。然后，我们提出了第一个强大的培训过程Rab，以平滑训练有素的模型，并证明其稳健性对抗后门攻击。我们派生机学习模型的稳健性突出了培训的机器学习模型，并证明我们的鲁棒性受到紧张。此外，我们表明，可以有效地训练强大的平滑模型，以适用于诸如k最近邻分类器的简单模型，并提出了一种精确的平滑训练算法，该算法消除了从这种模型的噪声分布采样采样的需要。经验上，我们对MNIST，CIFAR-10和Imagenet数据集等DNN，差异私有DNN和K-NN模型等不同机器学习（ML）型号进行了全面的实验，并为反卧系攻击提供认证稳健性的第一个基准。此外，我们在SPAMBase表格数据集上评估K-NN模型，以展示所提出的精确算法的优点。对多元化模型和数据集的综合评价既有关于普通训练时间攻击的进一步强劲学习策略的多样化模型和数据集的综合评价。

后门深度学习（DL）模型的行为通常在清洁输入上，但在触发器输入时不端行为，因为后门攻击者希望为DL模型部署构成严重后果。最先进的防御是限于特定的后门攻击（源无关攻击）或在该机器学习（ML）专业知识或昂贵的计算资源中不适用于源友好的攻击。这项工作观察到所有现有的后门攻击都具有不可避免的内在弱点，不可转换性，即触发器输入劫持劫持模型，但不能对另一个尚未植入同一后门的模型有效。通过此密钥观察，我们提出了不可转换性的反向检测（NTD）来识别运行时在运行时的模型欠测试（MUT）的触发输入。特定，NTD允许潜在的回溯静电预测输入的类别。同时，NTD利用特征提取器（FE）来提取输入的特征向量，并且从其预测类随机拾取的一组样本，然后比较FE潜在空间中的输入和样本之间的相似性。如果相似性低，则输入是对逆势触发输入;否则，良性。 FE是一个免费的预训练模型，私下从开放平台保留。随着FE和MUT来自不同来源，攻击者非常不可能将相同的后门插入其中两者。由于不可转换性，不能将突变处工作的触发效果转移到FE，使NTD对不同类型的后门攻击有效。我们在三个流行的定制任务中评估NTD，如面部识别，交通标志识别和一般动物分类，结果确认NDT具有高效率（低假验收率）和具有低检测延迟的可用性（低误报率）。

特洛伊木马后门是针对神经网络（NN）分类器的中毒攻击，对手试图利用（高度理想的）模型重用属性将特洛伊木马植入模型参数中，以通过中毒训练过程进行后门漏洞。大多数针对特洛伊木马攻击的防御措施都假设了白盒设置，其中防守者可以访问NN的内部状态，或者能够通过它进行后传播。在这项工作中，我们提出了一个更实用的黑盒防御，称为Trojdef，只能在NN上进行前进。 Trojdef试图通过监视输入因随机噪声反复扰动预测置信度的变化来识别和滤除特洛伊木马输入（即用Trojan触发器增强的输入）。我们根据预测输出得出一个函数，该函数称为预测置信度，以决定输入示例是否为特洛伊木马。直觉是，由于错误分类仅取决于触发因素，因此特洛伊木马的输入更加稳定，而由于分类特征的扰动，良性输入会受到损失。通过数学分析，我们表明，如果攻击者在注入后门时是完美的，则将训练特洛伊木马感染的模型以学习适当的预测置信度结合，该模型用于区分特洛伊木马和良性输入，并在任意扰动下。但是，由于攻击者在注入后门时可能不是完美的，因此我们将非线性转换引入了预测置信度，以提高实际环境中的检测准确性。广泛的经验评估表明，即使分类器体系结构，培训过程或超参数变化，Trojdef的表现明显优于州的防御能力，并且在不同的设置下也很稳定。

The authors thank Nicholas Carlini (UC Berkeley) and Dimitris Tsipras (MIT) for feedback to improve the survey quality. We also acknowledge X. Huang (Uni. Liverpool), K. R. Reddy (IISC), E. Valle (UNICAMP), Y. Yoo (CLAIR) and others for providing pointers to make the survey more comprehensive.

Vertical federated learning (VFL) is an emerging paradigm that enables collaborators to build machine learning models together in a distributed fashion. In general, these parties have a group of users in common but own different features. Existing VFL frameworks use cryptographic techniques to provide data privacy and security guarantees, leading to a line of works studying computing efficiency and fast implementation. However, the security of VFL's model remains underexplored.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly intensified research in the geoscience and remote sensing (RS) field. AI algorithms, especially deep learning-based ones, have been developed and applied widely to RS data analysis. The successful application of AI covers almost all aspects of Earth observation (EO) missions, from low-level vision tasks like super-resolution, denoising, and inpainting, to high-level vision tasks like scene classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation. While AI techniques enable researchers to observe and understand the Earth more accurately, the vulnerability and uncertainty of AI models deserve further attention, considering that many geoscience and RS tasks are highly safety-critical. This paper reviews the current development of AI security in the geoscience and RS field, covering the following five important aspects: adversarial attack, backdoor attack, federated learning, uncertainty, and explainability. Moreover, the potential opportunities and trends are discussed to provide insights for future research. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper is the first attempt to provide a systematic review of AI security-related research in the geoscience and RS community. Available code and datasets are also listed in the paper to move this vibrant field of research forward.