贝叶斯网络是一种图形模型，用于编码感兴趣的变量之间的概率关系。当与统计技术结合使用时，图形模型对数据分析具有几个优点。一个，因为模型对所有变量中的依赖性进行编码，因此它易于处理缺少某些数据条目的情况。二，贝叶斯网络可以用于学习因果关系，因此可以用来获得关于问题域的理解并预测干预的后果。三，因为该模型具有因果和概率语义，因此是结合先前知识（通常出现因果形式）和数据的理想表示。四，贝叶斯网络与贝叶斯网络的统计方法提供了一种有效和原则的方法，可以避免数据过剩。在本文中，我们讨论了从先前知识构建贝叶斯网络的方法，总结了使用数据来改善这些模型的贝叶斯统计方法。关于后一项任务，我们描述了学习贝叶斯网络的参数和结构的方法，包括使用不完整数据学习的技术。此外，我们还联系了贝叶斯网络方法，以学习监督和无监督学习的技术。我们说明了使用真实案例研究的图形建模方法。

这项正在进行的工作旨在为统计学习提供统一的介绍，从诸如GMM和HMM等经典模型到现代神经网络（如VAE和扩散模型）缓慢地构建。如今，有许多互联网资源可以孤立地解释这一点或新的机器学习算法，但是它们并没有（也不能在如此简短的空间中）将这些算法彼此连接起来，或者与统计模型的经典文献相连现代算法出现了。同样明显缺乏的是一个单一的符号系统，尽管对那些已经熟悉材料的人（如这些帖子的作者）不满意，但对新手的入境造成了重大障碍。同样，我的目的是将各种模型（尽可能）吸收到一个用于推理和学习的框架上，表明（以及为什么）如何以最小的变化将一个模型更改为另一个模型（其中一些是新颖的，另一些是文献中的）。某些背景当然是必要的。我以为读者熟悉基本的多变量计算，概率和统计以及线性代数。这本书的目标当然不是​​完整性，而是从基本知识到过去十年中极强大的新模型的直线路径或多或少。然后，目标是补充而不是替换，诸如Bishop的\ emph {模式识别和机器学习}之类的综合文本，该文本现在已经15岁了。

In this paper we prove the so-called "Meek Conjecture". In particular, we show that if a DAG H is an independence map of another DAG G, then there exists a finite sequence of edge additions and covered edge reversals in G such that (1) after each edge modification H remains an independence map of G and ( 2) after all modifications G = H. As shown by Meek (1997), this result has an important consequence for Bayesian approaches to learning Bayesian networks from data: in the limit of large sample size, there exists a twophase greedy search algorithm that-when applied to a particular sparsely-connected search space-provably identifies a perfect map of the generative distribution if that perfect map is a DAG. We provide a new implementation of the search space, using equivalence classes as states, for which all operators used in the greedy search can be scored efficiently using local functions of the nodes in the domain. Finally, using both synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrate that the two-phase greedy approach leads to good solutions when learning with finite sample sizes.

The notion of uncertainty is of major importance in machine learning and constitutes a key element of machine learning methodology. In line with the statistical tradition, uncertainty has long been perceived as almost synonymous with standard probability and probabilistic predictions. Yet, due to the steadily increasing relevance of machine learning for practical applications and related issues such as safety requirements, new problems and challenges have recently been identified by machine learning scholars, and these problems may call for new methodological developments. In particular, this includes the importance of distinguishing between (at least) two different types of uncertainty, often referred to as aleatoric and epistemic. In this paper, we provide an introduction to the topic of uncertainty in machine learning as well as an overview of attempts so far at handling uncertainty in general and formalizing this distinction in particular.

This paper presents a tutorial introduction to the use of variational methods for inference and learning in graphical models (Bayesian networks and Markov random fields). We present a number of examples of graphical models, including the QMR-DT database, the sigmoid belief network, the Boltzmann machine, and several variants of hidden Markov models, in which it is infeasible to run exact inference algorithms. We then introduce variational methods, which exploit laws of large numbers to transform the original graphical model into a simplified graphical model in which inference is efficient. Inference in the simpified model provides bounds on probabilities of interest in the original model. We describe a general framework for generating variational transformations based on convex duality. Finally we return to the examples and demonstrate how variational algorithms can be formulated in each case.

In this review, we discuss approaches for learning causal structure from data, also called causal discovery. In particular, we focus on approaches for learning directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and various generalizations which allow for some variables to be unobserved in the available data. We devote special attention to two fundamental combinatorial aspects of causal structure learning. First, we discuss the structure of the search space over causal graphs. Second, we discuss the structure of equivalence classes over causal graphs, i.e., sets of graphs which represent what can be learned from observational data alone, and how these equivalence classes can be refined by adding interventional data.

象征性的AI社区越来越多地试图在神经符号结构中接受机器学习，但由于文化障碍，仍在挣扎。为了打破障碍，这份相当有思想的个人备忘录试图解释和纠正统计，机器学习和深入学习的惯例，从局外人的角度进行深入学习。它提供了一个分步协议，用于设计一个机器学习系统，该系统满足符号AI社区认真对待所必需的最低理论保证，即，它讨论“在哪些条件下，我们可以停止担心和接受统计机器学习。 “一些亮点：大多数教科书都是为计划专门研究STAT/ML/DL的人编写的，应该接受术语。该备忘录适用于经验丰富的象征研究人员，他们听到了很多嗡嗡声，但仍然不确定和持怀疑态度。有关STAT/ML/DL的信息目前太分散或嘈杂而无法投资。此备忘录优先考虑紧凑性，并特别注意与象征性范式相互共鸣的概念。我希望这份备忘录能节省时间。它优先考虑一般数学建模，并且不讨论任何特定的函数近似器，例如神经网络（NNS），SVMS，决策树等。它可以对校正开放。将此备忘录视为与博客文章相似的内容，采用有关Arxiv的论文的形式。

因果关系是理解世界的科学努力的基本组成部分。不幸的是，在心理学和社会科学中，因果关系仍然是禁忌。由于越来越多的建议采用因果方法进行研究的重要性，我们重新制定了心理学研究方法的典型方法，以使不可避免的因果理论与其余的研究渠道协调。我们提出了一个新的过程，该过程始于从因果发现和机器学习的融合中纳入技术的发展，验证和透明的理论形式规范。然后，我们提出将完全指定的理论模型的复杂性降低到与给定目标假设相关的基本子模型中的方法。从这里，我们确定利息量是否可以从数据中估算出来，如果是的，则建议使用半参数机器学习方法来估计因果关系。总体目标是介绍新的研究管道，该管道可以（a）促进与测试因果理论的愿望兼容的科学询问（b）鼓励我们的理论透明代表作为明确的数学对象，（c）将我们的统计模型绑定到我们的统计模型中该理论的特定属性，因此减少了理论到模型间隙通常引起的规范不足问题，以及（d）产生因果关系和可重复性的结果和估计。通过具有现实世界数据的教学示例来证明该过程，我们以摘要和讨论来结论。

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

这是机器学习中（主要是）笔和纸练习的集合。练习在以下主题上：线性代数，优化，定向图形模型，无向图形模型，图形模型的表达能力，因子图和消息传递，隐藏马尔可夫模型的推断，基于模型的学习（包括ICA和非正态模型），采样和蒙特卡洛整合以及变异推断。

This review presents empirical researchers with recent advances in causal inference, and stresses the paradigmatic shifts that must be undertaken in moving from traditional statistical analysis to causal analysis of multivariate data. Special emphasis is placed on the assumptions that underly all causal inferences, the languages used in formulating those assumptions, the conditional nature of all causal and counterfactual claims, and the methods that have been developed for the assessment of such claims. These advances are illustrated using a general theory of causation based on the Structural Causal Model (SCM) described in Pearl (2000a), which subsumes and unifies other approaches to causation, and provides a coherent mathematical foundation for the analysis of causes and counterfactuals. In particular, the paper surveys the development of mathematical tools for inferring (from a combination of data and assumptions) answers to three types of causal queries: (1) queries about the effects of potential interventions, (also called "causal effects" or "policy evaluation") (2) queries about probabilities of counterfactuals, (including assessment of "regret," "attribution" or "causes of effects") and (3) queries about direct and indirect effects (also known as "mediation"). Finally, the paper defines the formal and conceptual relationships between the structural and potential-outcome frameworks and presents tools for a symbiotic analysis that uses the strong features of both.

社区检测是网络科学中最重要的方法领域之一，在过去的几十年里引起了大量关注的方法之一。该区域处理网络的自动部门到基础构建块中，目的是提供其大规模结构的概要。尽管它的重要性和广泛的采用普及，所谓的最先进和实际在各种领域实际使用的方法之间存在明显的差距。在这里，我们试图通过根据是否具有“描述性”或“推论”目标来划分现有方法来解决这种差异。虽然描述性方法在基于社区结构的直观概念的网络中找到模式的模式，但是推理方法阐述了精确的生成模型，并尝试将其符合数据。通过这种方式，他们能够为网络形成机制提供见解，并以统计证据支持的方式与随机性的单独结构。我们审查如何使用推论目标采用描述性方法被陷入困境和误导性答案，因此应该一般而言。我们认为推理方法更通常与更清晰的科学问题一致，产生更强大的结果，并且应该是一般的首选。我们试图消除一些神话和半真半假在实践中使用社区检测时，努力改善这些方法的使用以及对结果的解释。

在贝叶斯网络（BNS）中，边缘方向对于因果推理和推理至关重要。然而，马尔可夫等价类考虑因素意味着它并不总是可以建立边缘方向，这就是许多BN结构学习算法不能从纯粹观察数据定向所有边缘的原因。此外，潜在的混乱会导致假阳性边缘。已经提出了相对较少的方法来解决这些问题。在这项工作中，我们介绍了从涉及观察数据集的离散数据和一个或多个介入数据集的离散数据的结构学习的混合MFGS-BS（Meance规则和快速贪婪等价搜索）算法。该算法假设存在潜在变量的因果不足，并产生部分祖先图形（PAG）。结构学习依赖于混合方法和新的贝叶斯评分范式，用于计算添加到学习图表的每个定向边缘的后验概率。基于众所周知的网络的实验结果高达109个变量和10K样本大小表明，MFGS-BS相对于最先进的结构提高了结构学习准确性，并且它是计算效率的。

We present a new algorithm for Bayesian network structure learning, called Max-Min Hill-Climbing (MMHC). The algorithm combines ideas from local learning, constraint-based, and search-and-score techniques in a principled and effective way. It first reconstructs the skeleton of a Bayesian network and then performs a Bayesian-scoring greedy hill-climbing search to orient the edges. In our extensive empirical evaluation MMHC outperforms on average and in terms of various metrics several prototypical and state-of-the-art algorithms, namely the PC, Sparse Candidate, Three Phase Dependency Analysis, Optimal Reinsertion, Greedy Equivalence Search, and Greedy Search. These are the first empirical results simultaneously comparing most of the major Bayesian network algorithms against each other. MMHC offers certain theoretical advantages, specifically over the Sparse Candidate algorithm, corroborated by our experiments. MMHC and detailed results of our study are publicly available at http://www.dsl-lab.org/supplements/mmhc paper/mmhc index.html.

预测组合在预测社区中蓬勃发展，近年来，已经成为预测研究和活动主流的一部分。现在，由单个（目标）系列产生的多个预测组合通过整合来自不同来源收集的信息，从而提高准确性，从而减轻了识别单个“最佳”预测的风险。组合方案已从没有估计的简单组合方法演变为涉及时间变化的权重，非线性组合，组件之间的相关性和交叉学习的复杂方法。它们包括结合点预测和结合概率预测。本文提供了有关预测组合的广泛文献的最新评论，并参考可用的开源软件实施。我们讨论了各种方法的潜在和局限性，并突出了这些思想如何随着时间的推移而发展。还调查了有关预测组合实用性的一些重要问题。最后，我们以当前的研究差距和未来研究的潜在见解得出结论。

This work shows how to leverage causal inference to understand the behavior of complex learning systems interacting with their environment and predict the consequences of changes to the system. Such predictions allow both humans and algorithms to select the changes that would have improved the system performance. This work is illustrated by experiments on the ad placement system associated with the Bing search engine.

One of the core problems of modern statistics is to approximate difficult-to-compute probability densities. This problem is especially important in Bayesian statistics, which frames all inference about unknown quantities as a calculation involving the posterior density. In this paper, we review variational inference (VI), a method from machine learning that approximates probability densities through optimization. VI has been used in many applications and tends to be faster than classical methods, such as Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. The idea behind VI is to first posit a family of densities and then to find the member of that family which is close to the target. Closeness is measured by Kullback-Leibler divergence. We review the ideas behind mean-field variational inference, discuss the special case of VI applied to exponential family models, present a full example with a Bayesian mixture of Gaussians, and derive a variant that uses stochastic optimization to scale up to massive data. We discuss modern research in VI and highlight important open problems. VI is powerful, but it is not yet well understood. Our hope in writing this paper is to catalyze statistical research on this class of algorithms.

回归模型用于各种应用，为来自不同领域的研究人员提供强大的科学工具。线性或简单的参数，模型通常不足以描述输入变量与响应之间的复杂关系。通过诸如神经网络的灵活方法可以更好地描述这种关系，但这导致不太可解释的模型和潜在的过度装备。或者，可以使用特定的参数非线性函数，但是这种功能的规范通常是复杂的。在本文中，我们介绍了一种灵活的施工方法，高度灵活的非线性参数回归模型。非线性特征是分层的，类似于深度学习，但对要考虑的可能类型的功能具有额外的灵活性。这种灵活性，与变量选择相结合，使我们能够找到一小部分重要特征，从而可以更具可解释的模型。在可能的功能的空间内，考虑了贝叶斯方法，基于它们的复杂性引入功能的前沿。采用遗传修改模式跳跃马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗算法来执行贝叶斯推理和估计模型平均的后验概率。在各种应用中，我们说明了我们的方法如何用于获得有意义的非线性模型。此外，我们将其预测性能与多个机器学习算法进行比较。

基于AI和机器学习的决策系统已在各种现实世界中都使用，包括医疗保健，执法，教育和金融。不再是牵强的，即设想一个未来，自治系统将推动整个业务决策，并且更广泛地支持大规模决策基础设施以解决社会最具挑战性的问题。当人类做出决定时，不公平和歧视的问题普遍存在，并且当使用几乎没有透明度，问责制和公平性的机器做出决定时（或可能会放大）。在本文中，我们介绍了\ textit {Causal公平分析}的框架，目的是填补此差距，即理解，建模，并可能解决决策设置中的公平性问题。我们方法的主要见解是将观察到数据中存在的差异的量化与基本且通常是未观察到的因果机制收集的因果机制的收集，这些机制首先会产生差异，挑战我们称之为因果公平的基本问题分析（FPCFA）。为了解决FPCFA，我们研究了分解差异和公平性的经验度量的问题，将这种变化归因于结构机制和人群的不同单位。我们的努力最终达到了公平地图，这是组织和解释文献中不同标准之间关系的首次系统尝试。最后，我们研究了进行因果公平分析并提出一本公平食谱的最低因果假设，该假设使数据科学家能够评估不同影响和不同治疗的存在。

这是模型选择和假设检测的边缘似然计算的最新介绍和概述。计算概率模型（或常量比率）的常规规定常数是许多统计数据，应用数学，信号处理和机器学习中的许多应用中的基本问题。本文提供了对主题的全面研究。我们突出了不同技术之间的局限性，优势，连接和差异。还描述了使用不正确的前沿的问题和可能的解决方案。通过理论比较和数值实验比较一些最相关的方法。