我们提出了一种基于最大平均差异（MMD）的新型非参数两样本测试，该测试是通过具有不同核带宽的聚合测试来构建的。这种称为MMDAGG的聚合过程可确保对所使用的内核的收集最大化测试能力，而无需持有核心选择的数据（这会导致测试能力损失）或任意内核选择，例如中位数启发式。我们在非反应框架中工作，并证明我们的聚集测试对Sobolev球具有最小自适应性。我们的保证不仅限于特定的内核，而是符合绝对可集成的一维翻译不变特性内核的任何产品。此外，我们的结果适用于流行的数值程序来确定测试阈值，即排列和野生引导程序。通过对合成数据集和现实世界数据集的数值实验，我们证明了MMDAGG优于MMD内核适应的替代方法，用于两样本测试。

我们使用最大平均差异（MMD），Hilbert Schmidt独立标准（HSIC）和内核Stein差异（KSD），，提出了一系列针对两样本，独立性和合适性问题的计算效率，非参数测试，用于两样本，独立性和合适性问题。分别。我们的测试统计数据是不完整的$ u $统计信息，其计算成本与与经典$ u $ u $统计测试相关的样本数量和二次时间之间的线性时间之间的插值。这三个提出的测试在几个内核带宽上汇总，以检测各种尺度的零件：我们称之为结果测试mmdagginc，hsicagginc和ksdagginc。对于测试阈值，我们得出了一个针对野生引导不完整的$ U $ - 统计数据的分位数，该统计是独立的。我们得出了MMDagginc和Hsicagginc的均匀分离率，并准确量化了计算效率和可实现速率之间的权衡：据我们所知，该结果是基于不完整的$ U $统计学的测试新颖的。我们进一步表明，在二次时间案例中，野生引导程序不会对基于更广泛的基于置换的方法进行测试功率，因为​​两者都达到了相同的最小最佳速率（这反过来又与使用Oracle分位数的速率相匹配）。我们通过数值实验对计算效率和测试能力之间的权衡进行数字实验来支持我们的主张。在三个测试框架中，我们观察到我们提出的线性时间聚合测试获得的功率高于当前最新线性时间内核测试。

我们研究了基于内核Stein差异（KSD）的合适性测试的特性。我们介绍了一种构建一个名为KSDAGG的测试的策略，该测试与不同的核聚集了多个测试。 KSDAGG避免将数据分开以执行内核选择（这会导致测试能力损失），并最大程度地提高了核集合的测试功率。我们提供有关KSDAGG的力量的理论保证：我们证明它达到了收集最小的分离率，直到对数期限。可以在实践中准确计算KSDAGG，因为它依赖于参数bootstrap或野生引导程序来估计分位数和级别校正。特别是，对于固定核的带宽至关重要的选择，它避免了诉诸于任意启发式方法（例如中位数或标准偏差）或数据拆分。我们在合成数据和现实世界中发现KSDAGG优于其他基于自适应KSD的拟合优度测试程序。

Over the last decade, an approach that has gained a lot of popularity to tackle non-parametric testing problems on general (i.e., non-Euclidean) domains is based on the notion of reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) embedding of probability distributions. The main goal of our work is to understand the optimality of two-sample tests constructed based on this approach. First, we show that the popular MMD (maximum mean discrepancy) two-sample test is not optimal in terms of the separation boundary measured in Hellinger distance. Second, we propose a modification to the MMD test based on spectral regularization by taking into account the covariance information (which is not captured by the MMD test) and prove the proposed test to be minimax optimal with a smaller separation boundary than that achieved by the MMD test. Third, we propose an adaptive version of the above test which involves a data-driven strategy to choose the regularization parameter and show the adaptive test to be almost minimax optimal up to a logarithmic factor. Moreover, our results hold for the permutation variant of the test where the test threshold is chosen elegantly through the permutation of the samples. Through numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world data, we demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed test in comparison to the MMD test.

We propose a framework for analyzing and comparing distributions, which we use to construct statistical tests to determine if two samples are drawn from different distributions. Our test statistic is the largest difference in expectations over functions in the unit ball of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), and is called the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). We present two distributionfree tests based on large deviation bounds for the MMD, and a third test based on the asymptotic distribution of this statistic. The MMD can be computed in quadratic time, although efficient linear time approximations are available. Our statistic is an instance of an integral probability metric, and various classical metrics on distributions are obtained when alternative function classes are used in place of an RKHS. We apply our two-sample tests to a variety of problems, including attribute matching for databases using the Hungarian marriage method, where they perform strongly. Excellent performance is also obtained when comparing distributions over graphs, for which these are the first such tests.

Classical asymptotic theory for statistical inference usually involves calibrating a statistic by fixing the dimension $d$ while letting the sample size $n$ increase to infinity. Recently, much effort has been dedicated towards understanding how these methods behave in high-dimensional settings, where $d$ and $n$ both increase to infinity together. This often leads to different inference procedures, depending on the assumptions about the dimensionality, leaving the practitioner in a bind: given a dataset with 100 samples in 20 dimensions, should they calibrate by assuming $n \gg d$, or $d/n \approx 0.2$? This paper considers the goal of dimension-agnostic inference; developing methods whose validity does not depend on any assumption on $d$ versus $n$. We introduce an approach that uses variational representations of existing test statistics along with sample splitting and self-normalization to produce a new test statistic with a Gaussian limiting distribution, regardless of how $d$ scales with $n$. The resulting statistic can be viewed as a careful modification of degenerate U-statistics, dropping diagonal blocks and retaining off-diagonal blocks. We exemplify our technique for some classical problems including one-sample mean and covariance testing, and show that our tests have minimax rate-optimal power against appropriate local alternatives. In most settings, our cross U-statistic matches the high-dimensional power of the corresponding (degenerate) U-statistic up to a $\sqrt{2}$ factor.

The kernel Maximum Mean Discrepancy~(MMD) is a popular multivariate distance metric between distributions that has found utility in two-sample testing. The usual kernel-MMD test statistic is a degenerate U-statistic under the null, and thus it has an intractable limiting distribution. Hence, to design a level-$\alpha$ test, one usually selects the rejection threshold as the $(1-\alpha)$-quantile of the permutation distribution. The resulting nonparametric test has finite-sample validity but suffers from large computational cost, since every permutation takes quadratic time. We propose the cross-MMD, a new quadratic-time MMD test statistic based on sample-splitting and studentization. We prove that under mild assumptions, the cross-MMD has a limiting standard Gaussian distribution under the null. Importantly, we also show that the resulting test is consistent against any fixed alternative, and when using the Gaussian kernel, it has minimax rate-optimal power against local alternatives. For large sample sizes, our new cross-MMD provides a significant speedup over the MMD, for only a slight loss in power.

Testing the significance of a variable or group of variables $X$ for predicting a response $Y$, given additional covariates $Z$, is a ubiquitous task in statistics. A simple but common approach is to specify a linear model, and then test whether the regression coefficient for $X$ is non-zero. However, when the model is misspecified, the test may have poor power, for example when $X$ is involved in complex interactions, or lead to many false rejections. In this work we study the problem of testing the model-free null of conditional mean independence, i.e. that the conditional mean of $Y$ given $X$ and $Z$ does not depend on $X$. We propose a simple and general framework that can leverage flexible nonparametric or machine learning methods, such as additive models or random forests, to yield both robust error control and high power. The procedure involves using these methods to perform regressions, first to estimate a form of projection of $Y$ on $X$ and $Z$ using one half of the data, and then to estimate the expected conditional covariance between this projection and $Y$ on the remaining half of the data. While the approach is general, we show that a version of our procedure using spline regression achieves what we show is the minimax optimal rate in this nonparametric testing problem. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach both in terms of maintaining Type I error control, and power, compared to several existing approaches.

We develop an online kernel Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) procedure, which consists of a parallel set of kernel statistics with different window sizes to account for the unknown change-point location. Compared with many existing sliding window-based kernel change-point detection procedures, which correspond to the Shewhart chart-type procedure, the proposed procedure is more sensitive to small changes. We further present a recursive computation of detection statistics, which is crucial for online procedures to achieve a constant computational and memory complexity, such that we do not need to calculate and remember the entire Gram matrix, which can be a computational bottleneck otherwise. We obtain precise analytic approximations of the two fundamental performance metrics, the Average Run Length (ARL) and Expected Detection Delay (EDD). Furthermore, we establish the optimal window size on the order of $\log ({\rm ARL})$ such that there is nearly no power loss compared with an oracle procedure, which is analogous to the classic result for window-limited Generalized Likelihood Ratio (GLR) procedure. We present extensive numerical experiments to validate our theoretical results and the competitive performance of the proposed method.

本文研究了基于Laplacian Eigenmaps（Le）的基于Laplacian EIGENMAPS（PCR-LE）的主要成分回归的统计性质，这是基于Laplacian Eigenmaps（Le）的非参数回归的方法。 PCR-LE通过投影观察到的响应的向量$ {\ bf y} =（y_1，\ ldots，y_n）$ to to changbood图表拉普拉斯的某些特征向量跨越的子空间。我们表明PCR-Le通过SoboLev空格实现了随机设计回归的最小收敛速率。在设计密度$ P $的足够平滑条件下，PCR-le达到估计的最佳速率（其中已知平方$ l ^ 2 $ norm的最佳速率为$ n ^ { - 2s /（2s + d） ）} $）和健美的测试（$ n ^ { - 4s /（4s + d）$）。我们还表明PCR-LE是\ EMPH {歧管Adaptive}：即，我们考虑在小型内在维度$ M $的歧管上支持设计的情况，并为PCR-LE提供更快的界限Minimax估计（$ n ^ { - 2s /（2s + m）$）和测试（$ n ^ { - 4s /（4s + m）$）收敛率。有趣的是，这些利率几乎总是比图形拉普拉斯特征向量的已知收敛率更快;换句话说，对于这个问题的回归估计的特征似乎更容易，统计上讲，而不是估计特征本身。我们通过经验证据支持这些理论结果。

我们在右审查的生存时间和协变量之间介绍一般的非参数独立测试，这可能是多变量的。我们的测试统计数据具有双重解释，首先是潜在无限的重量索引日志秩检验的超级索引，具有属于函数的再现内核HILBERT空间（RKHS）的重量函数;其次，作为某些有限措施的嵌入差异的规范，与Hilbert-Schmidt独立性标准（HSIC）测试统计类似。我们研究了测试的渐近性质，找到了足够的条件，以确保我们的测试在任何替代方案下正确拒绝零假设。可以直截了当地计算测试统计，并且通过渐近总体的野外自注程序进行拒绝阈值。对模拟和实际数据的广泛调查表明，我们的测试程序通常比检测复杂的非线性依赖的竞争方法更好。

In nonparametric independence testing, we observe i.i.d.\ data $\{(X_i,Y_i)\}_{i=1}^n$, where $X \in \mathcal{X}, Y \in \mathcal{Y}$ lie in any general spaces, and we wish to test the null that $X$ is independent of $Y$. Modern test statistics such as the kernel Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) and Distance Covariance (dCov) have intractable null distributions due to the degeneracy of the underlying U-statistics. Thus, in practice, one often resorts to using permutation testing, which provides a nonasymptotic guarantee at the expense of recalculating the quadratic-time statistics (say) a few hundred times. This paper provides a simple but nontrivial modification of HSIC and dCov (called xHSIC and xdCov, pronounced ``cross'' HSIC/dCov) so that they have a limiting Gaussian distribution under the null, and thus do not require permutations. This requires building on the newly developed theory of cross U-statistics by Kim and Ramdas (2020), and in particular developing several nontrivial extensions of the theory in Shekhar et al. (2022), which developed an analogous permutation-free kernel two-sample test. We show that our new tests, like the originals, are consistent against fixed alternatives, and minimax rate optimal against smooth local alternatives. Numerical simulations demonstrate that compared to the full dCov or HSIC, our variants have the same power up to a $\sqrt 2$ factor, giving practitioners a new option for large problems or data-analysis pipelines where computation, not sample size, could be the bottleneck.

我们提出了对非参数仪器变量（NPIV）模型中的结构函数的多面体锥体（例如，单调性，凸起）和平等（例如，参数，半游戏）限制的新的自适应假设试验。我们的测试统计是基于受限制和不受限制的筛估计之间的二次距离的改进的休假样本模拟。我们提供筛选调整参数的计算简单，数据驱动的选择和调整的CHI平方临界值。我们的测试在未知的内能性和仪器的未知强度存在下适应替代功能的未知平滑度。它达到了$ ^ 2 $以$ ^ 2 $的试验率。也就是说，通过未知规则的NPIV模型的任何其他假设测试，不能改善其在复合空缺上均匀地均匀地均匀的I型错误及其类型的II误差。通过反转自适应测试，可以获得数据驱动的置信度量为$ ^ 2 $。模拟确认我们的自适应测试控制规模及其有限样本功率极大地超过了NPIV模型中的单调性和参数限制的现有非自适应测试。介绍了对差异化产品需求和Engel曲线进行形状限制的经验应用。

对于高维和非参数统计模型，速率最优估计器平衡平方偏差和方差是一种常见的现象。虽然这种平衡被广泛观察到，但很少知道是否存在可以避免偏差和方差之间的权衡的方法。我们提出了一般的策略，以获得对任何估计方差的下限，偏差小于预先限定的界限。这表明偏差差异折衷的程度是不可避免的，并且允许量化不服从其的方法的性能损失。该方法基于许多抽象的下限，用于涉及关于不同概率措施的预期变化以及诸如Kullback-Leibler或Chi-Sque-diversence的信息措施的变化。其中一些不平等依赖于信息矩阵的新概念。在该物品的第二部分中，将抽象的下限应用于几种统计模型，包括高斯白噪声模型，边界估计问题，高斯序列模型和高维线性回归模型。对于这些特定的统计应用，发生不同类型的偏差差异发生，其实力变化很大。对于高斯白噪声模型中集成平方偏置和集成方差之间的权衡，我们将较低界限的一般策略与减少技术相结合。这允许我们将原始问题与估计的估计器中的偏差折衷联动，以更简单的统计模型中具有额外的对称性属性。在高斯序列模型中，发生偏差差异的不同相位转换。虽然偏差和方差之间存在非平凡的相互作用，但是平方偏差的速率和方差不必平衡以实现最小估计速率。

内核平均值嵌入是一种强大的工具，可以代表任意空间上的概率分布作为希尔伯特空间中的单个点。然而，计算和存储此类嵌入的成本禁止其在大规模设置中的直接使用。我们提出了一个基于NyStr \“ Om方法的有效近似过程，该过程利用了数据集的一个小随机子集。我们的主要结果是该过程的近似误差的上限。它在子样本大小上产生足够的条件以获得足够的条件。降低计算成本的同时，标准的$ n^{ - 1/2} $。我们讨论了此结果的应用，以近似的最大平均差异和正交规则，并通过数值实验说明了我们的理论发现。

我们提出了一种统一的技术，用于顺序估计分布之间的凸面分歧，包括内核最大差异等积分概率度量，$ \ varphi $ - 像Kullback-Leibler发散，以及最佳运输成本，例如Wassersein距离的权力。这是通过观察到经验凸起分歧（部分有序）反向半角分离的实现来实现的，而可交换过滤耦合，其具有这些方法的最大不等式。这些技术似乎是对置信度序列和凸分流的现有文献的互补和强大的补充。我们构建一个离线到顺序设备，将各种现有的离线浓度不等式转换为可以连续监测的时间均匀置信序列，在任意停止时间提供有效的测试或置信区间。得到的顺序边界仅在相应的固定时间范围内支付迭代对数价格，保留对问题参数的相同依赖性（如适用的尺寸或字母大小）。这些结果也适用于更一般的凸起功能，如负差分熵，实证过程的高度和V型统计。

基于内核的测试提供了一个简单而有效的框架，该框架使用繁殖内核希尔伯特空间的理论设计非参数测试程序。在本文中，我们提出了新的理论工具，可用于在几种数据方案以及许多不同的测试问题中研究基于内核测试的渐近行为。与当前的方法不同，我们的方法避免使用冗长的$ u $和$ v $统计信息扩展并限制定理，该定理通常出现在文献中，并直接与希尔伯特空格上的随机功能合作。因此，我们的框架会导致对内核测试的简单明了的分析，只需要轻度的规律条件。此外，我们表明，通常可以通过证明我们方法所需的规律条件既足够又需要进行必要的规律条件来改进我们的分析。为了说明我们的方法的有效性，我们为有条件的独立性测试问题提供了一项新的内核测试，以及针对已知的基于内核测试的新分析。

我们提出了对学度校正随机块模型（DCSBM）的合适性测试。该测试基于调整后的卡方统计量，用于测量$ n $多项式分布的组之间的平等性，该分布具有$ d_1，\ dots，d_n $观测值。在网络模型的背景下，多项式的数量（$ n $）的数量比观测值数量（$ d_i $）快得多，与节点$ i $的度相对应，因此设置偏离了经典的渐近学。我们表明，只要$ \ {d_i \} $的谐波平均值生长到无穷大，就可以使统计量在NULL下分配。顺序应用时，该测试也可以用于确定社区数量。该测试在邻接矩阵的压缩版本上进行操作，因此在学位上有条件，因此对大型稀疏网络具有高度可扩展性。我们结合了一个新颖的想法，即在测试$ K $社区时根据$（k+1）$ - 社区分配来压缩行。这种方法在不牺牲计算效率的情况下增加了顺序应用中的力量，我们证明了它在恢复社区数量方面的一致性。由于测试统计量不依赖于特定的替代方案，因此其效用超出了顺序测试，可用于同时测试DCSBM家族以外的各种替代方案。特别是，我们证明该测试与具有社区结构的潜在可变性网络模型的一般家庭一致。

经典的错误发现率（FDR）控制程序提供了强大而可解释的保证，而它们通常缺乏灵活性。另一方面，最近的机器学习分类算法是基于随机森林（RF）或神经网络（NN）的算法，具有出色的实践表现，但缺乏解释和理论保证。在本文中，我们通过引入新的自适应新颖性检测程序（称为Adadetect）来使这两个相遇。它将多个测试文献的最新作品范围扩展到高维度的范围，尤其是Yang等人的范围。 （2021）。显示AD​​ADETECT既可以强烈控制FDR，又具有在特定意义上模仿甲骨文之一的力量。理论结果，几个基准数据集上的数值实验以及对天体物理数据的应用，我们的方法的兴趣和有效性得到了证明。特别是，虽然可以将AdadEtect与任何分类器结合使用，但它在带有RF的现实世界数据集以及带有NN的图像上特别有效。

在因果推理和强盗文献中，基于观察数据的线性功能估算线性功能的问题是规范的。我们分析了首先估计治疗效果函数的广泛的两阶段程序，然后使用该数量来估计线性功能。我们证明了此类过程的均方误差上的非反应性上限：这些边界表明，为了获得非反应性最佳程序，应在特定加权$ l^2 $中最大程度地估算治疗效果的误差。 -规范。我们根据该加权规范的约束回归分析了两阶段的程序，并通过匹配非轴突局部局部最小值下限，在有限样品中建立了实例依赖性最优性。这些结果表明，除了取决于渐近效率方差之外，最佳的非质子风险除了取决于样本量支持的最富有函数类别的真实结果函数与其近似类别之间的加权规范距离。