The mediocre performance of conventional federated learning (FL) over heterogeneous data has been facilitating personalized FL solutions, where, unlike conventional FL which trains a single global consensus model, different models are allowed for different clients. However, in most existing personalized FL algorithms, the collaborative knowledge across the federation was only implicitly passed to the clients in ways such as model aggregation or regularization. We observed that this implicit knowledge transfer fails to maximize the potential value of each client's empirical risk toward other clients. Based on our observation, in this work, we propose Personalized Global Federated Learning (PGFed), a novel personalized FL framework that enables each client to personalize its own global objective by explicitly and adaptively aggregating the empirical risks of itself and other clients. To avoid massive ($O(N^2)$) communication overhead and potential privacy leakage, each client's risk is estimated through a first-order approximation for other clients' adaptive risk aggregation. On top of PGFed, we develop a momentum upgrade, dubbed PGFedMo, to more efficiently utilize clients' empirical risks. Our extensive experiments under different federated settings with benchmark datasets show consistent improvements of PGFed over the compared state-of-the-art alternatives.

联合学习（FL）是一个有希望的策略，用于使用客户端（即边缘设备）的网络进行隐私保留，分布式学习。然而，客户之间的数据分布通常是非IID的，使得有效优化困难。为了缓解这个问题，许多流行算法专注于通过引入各种近似术语，一些产生可观的计算和/或内存开销来减轻客户端跨客户端的影响，以限制关于全局模型的本地更新。相反，我们考虑重新思考的解决方案，以重点关注局部学习一般性而不是近端限制。为此，我们首先提出了一项系统的研究，通过二阶指标通知，更好地了解FL中的算法效果。有趣的是，我们发现标准的正则化方法令人惊讶的是减轻数据异质性效应的强烈表现者。根据我们的调查结果，我们进一步提出了一种简单有效的方法，努力克服数据异质性和先前方法的陷阱。 FedAlign在各种设置中使用最先进的FL方法实现了竞争准确性，同时最大限度地减少计算和内存开销。代码将公开。

基于深度学习的人网格重建方法具有构建更大网络的趋势，以实现更高的准确性。尽管是人网格重建模型的实际使用的关键特征，但往往忽略了计算复杂性和模型大小（例如，虚拟试用系统）。在本文中，我们呈现GTR，这是一种基于轻量级的姿势的方法，可以从2D人类姿势重建人网。我们提出了一种姿势分析模块，它使用曲线图形是利用结构化和隐式的关节相关性，以及将提取的姿势特征与网格模板组合以重建最终人体网格的网格回归模块。我们通过对人类3.6M和3DPW数据集进行广泛的评估，展示了GTR的效率和泛化。特别是，GTRS比SOTA姿势的方法POSE2MESH实现了更好的精度，同时仅使用10.2％的参数（PARAMS）和2.5％的跨越式3DPW数据集。代码将公开。

大多数现有的深神经网络都是静态的，这意味着它们只能以固定的复杂性推断。但资源预算可以大幅度不同。即使在一个设备上，实惠预算也可以用不同的场景改变，并且对每个所需预算的反复培训网络是非常昂贵的。因此，在这项工作中，我们提出了一种称为Mutualnet的一般方法，以训练可以以各种资源约束运行的单个网络。我们的方法列举了具有各种网络宽度和输入分辨率的模型配置队列。这种相互学习方案不仅允许模型以不同的宽度分辨率配置运行，而且还可以在这些配置之间传输独特的知识，帮助模型来学习更强大的表示。 Mutualnet是一般的培训方法，可以应用于各种网络结构（例如，2D网络：MobileNets，Reset，3D网络：速度，X3D）和各种任务（例如，图像分类，对象检测，分段和动作识别），并证明了实现各种数据集的一致性改进。由于我们只培训了这一模型，它对独立培训多种型号而言，它也大大降低了培训成本。令人惊讶的是，如果动态资源约束不是一个问题，则可以使用Mutualnet来显着提高单个网络的性能。总之，Mutualnet是静态和自适应，2D和3D网络的统一方法。代码和预先训练的模型可用于\ url {https://github.com/tayang1122/mutualnet}。

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and generation, but the quality bar for medical and clinical applications is high. Today, attempts to assess models' clinical knowledge typically rely on automated evaluations on limited benchmarks. There is no standard to evaluate model predictions and reasoning across a breadth of tasks. To address this, we present MultiMedQA, a benchmark combining six existing open question answering datasets spanning professional medical exams, research, and consumer queries; and HealthSearchQA, a new free-response dataset of medical questions searched online. We propose a framework for human evaluation of model answers along multiple axes including factuality, precision, possible harm, and bias. In addition, we evaluate PaLM (a 540-billion parameter LLM) and its instruction-tuned variant, Flan-PaLM, on MultiMedQA. Using a combination of prompting strategies, Flan-PaLM achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on every MultiMedQA multiple-choice dataset (MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, MMLU clinical topics), including 67.6% accuracy on MedQA (US Medical License Exam questions), surpassing prior state-of-the-art by over 17%. However, human evaluation reveals key gaps in Flan-PaLM responses. To resolve this we introduce instruction prompt tuning, a parameter-efficient approach for aligning LLMs to new domains using a few exemplars. The resulting model, Med-PaLM, performs encouragingly, but remains inferior to clinicians. We show that comprehension, recall of knowledge, and medical reasoning improve with model scale and instruction prompt tuning, suggesting the potential utility of LLMs in medicine. Our human evaluations reveal important limitations of today's models, reinforcing the importance of both evaluation frameworks and method development in creating safe, helpful LLM models for clinical applications.

State-of-the-art object detectors are treated as black boxes due to their highly non-linear internal computations. Even with unprecedented advancements in detector performance, the inability to explain how their outputs are generated limits their use in safety-critical applications. Previous work fails to produce explanations for both bounding box and classification decisions, and generally make individual explanations for various detectors. In this paper, we propose an open-source Detector Explanation Toolkit (DExT) which implements the proposed approach to generate a holistic explanation for all detector decisions using certain gradient-based explanation methods. We suggests various multi-object visualization methods to merge the explanations of multiple objects detected in an image as well as the corresponding detections in a single image. The quantitative evaluation show that the Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD) is more faithfully explained compared to other detectors regardless of the explanation methods. Both quantitative and human-centric evaluations identify that SmoothGrad with Guided Backpropagation (GBP) provides more trustworthy explanations among selected methods across all detectors. We expect that DExT will motivate practitioners to evaluate object detectors from the interpretability perspective by explaining both bounding box and classification decisions.

Inference from large autoregressive models like Transformers is slow - decoding K tokens takes K serial runs of the model. In this work we introduce speculative decoding - an algorithm to sample from autoregressive models faster without any changes to the outputs, by computing several tokens in parallel. At the heart of our approach lie the observations that (1) hard language-modeling tasks often include easier subtasks that can be approximated well by more efficient models, and (2) using speculative execution and a novel sampling method, we can make exact decoding from the large models faster, by running them in parallel on the outputs of the approximation models, potentially generating several tokens concurrently, and without changing the distribution. Our method supports existing off-the-shelf models without retraining or architecture changes. We demonstrate it on T5-XXL and show a 2X-3X acceleration compared to the standard T5X implementation, with identical outputs.

Trusting the predictions of deep learning models in safety critical settings such as the medical domain is still not a viable option. Distentangled uncertainty quantification in the field of medical imaging has received little attention. In this paper, we study disentangled uncertainties in image to image translation tasks in the medical domain. We compare multiple uncertainty quantification methods, namely Ensembles, Flipout, Dropout, and DropConnect, while using CycleGAN to convert T1-weighted brain MRI scans to T2-weighted brain MRI scans. We further evaluate uncertainty behavior in the presence of out of distribution data (Brain CT and RGB Face Images), showing that epistemic uncertainty can be used to detect out of distribution inputs, which should increase reliability of model outputs.

Safety-critical applications like autonomous driving use Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) for object detection and segmentation. The DNNs fail to predict when they observe an Out-of-Distribution (OOD) input leading to catastrophic consequences. Existing OOD detection methods were extensively studied for image inputs but have not been explored much for LiDAR inputs. So in this study, we proposed two datasets for benchmarking OOD detection in 3D semantic segmentation. We used Maximum Softmax Probability and Entropy scores generated using Deep Ensembles and Flipout versions of RandLA-Net as OOD scores. We observed that Deep Ensembles out perform Flipout model in OOD detection with greater AUROC scores for both datasets.

Increasingly high-stakes decisions are made using neural networks in order to make predictions. Specifically, meteorologists and hedge funds apply these techniques to time series data. When it comes to prediction, there are certain limitations for machine learning models (such as lack of expressiveness, vulnerability of domain shifts and overconfidence) which can be solved using uncertainty estimation. There is a set of expectations regarding how uncertainty should ``behave". For instance, a wider prediction horizon should lead to more uncertainty or the model's confidence should be proportional to its accuracy. In this paper, different uncertainty estimation methods are compared to forecast meteorological time series data and evaluate these expectations. The results show how each uncertainty estimation method performs on the forecasting task, which partially evaluates the robustness of predicted uncertainty.