Despite the success of large language models (LLMs) in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, the stored knowledge in these models may inevitably be incomplete, out-of-date, or incorrect. This motivates the need to utilize external knowledge to assist LLMs. Unfortunately, current methods for incorporating external knowledge often require additional training or fine-tuning, which can be costly and may not be feasible for LLMs. To address this issue, we propose a novel post-processing approach, rethinking with retrieval (RR), which retrieves relevant external knowledge based on the decomposed reasoning steps obtained from the chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. This lightweight approach does not require additional training or fine-tuning and is not limited by the input length of LLMs. We evaluate the effectiveness of RR through extensive experiments with GPT-3 on three complex reasoning tasks: commonsense reasoning, temporal reasoning, and tabular reasoning. Our results show that RR can produce more faithful explanations and improve the performance of LLMs.

在维持预审预定序列模型的灵活性的同时，是否有利于常识性推理，这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。为了调查这个问题，我们开发了生成的知识提示，该提示包括从语言模型中生成知识，然后在回答问题时提供知识作为附加输入。我们的方法不需要特定于任务的监督知识集成或访问结构化的知识库，但它可以提高四个常识性推理任务上的大规模，最先进的模型的性能，从而实现最先进-ART结果取决于数值常识（NumerSense），通用常识性（Commonsenseqa 2.0）和科学常识（QASC）基准。产生的知识促使大型语言模型是灵活的外部知识来源，以改善常识性推理。我们的代码可从https://github.com/liujch1998/gkp获得

Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown remarkable reasoning performance using explanations (or ``chain-of-thought'' (CoT)) for in-context learning. On the other hand, these reasoning tasks are usually presumed to be more approachable for symbolic programming. To make progress towards understanding in-context learning, we curate synthetic datasets containing equivalent (natural, symbolic) data pairs, where symbolic examples contain first-order logic rules and predicates from knowledge bases (KBs). Then we revisit neuro-symbolic approaches and use Language Models as Logic Programmer (LMLP) that learns from demonstrations containing logic rules and corresponding examples to iteratively reason over KBs, recovering Prolog's backward chaining algorithm. Comprehensive experiments are included to systematically compare LMLP with CoT in deductive reasoning settings, showing that LMLP enjoys more than 25% higher accuracy than CoT on length generalization benchmarks even with fewer parameters.

Large language models that are capable of zero or few-shot prompting approaches have given rise to the new research area of prompt engineering. Recent advances showed that for example Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompts can improve arithmetic or common sense tasks significantly. We explore how such approaches fair with legal reasoning tasks and take the COLIEE entailment task based on the Japanese Bar exam for testing zero-shot/few-shot and fine-tuning approaches. Our findings show that while CoT prompting and fine-tuning with explanations approaches show improvements, the best results are produced by prompts that are derived from specific legal reasoning techniques such as IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion). Based on our experiments we improve the 2021 best result from 0.7037 accuracy to 0.8148 accuracy and beat the 2022 best system of 0.6789 accuracy with an accuracy of 0.7431.

Reasoning, as an essential ability for complex problem-solving, can provide back-end support for various real-world applications, such as medical diagnosis, negotiation, etc. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of cutting-edge research on reasoning with language model prompting. We introduce research works with comparisons and summaries and provide systematic resources to help beginners. We also discuss the potential reasons for emerging such reasoning abilities and highlight future research directions.

Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) requires models to answer factoid questions with no context given. The common way for this task is to train models on a large-scale annotated dataset to retrieve related documents and generate answers based on these documents. In this paper, we show that the ODQA architecture can be dramatically simplified by treating Large Language Models (LLMs) as a knowledge corpus and propose a Self-Prompting framework for LLMs to perform ODQA so as to eliminate the need for training data and external knowledge corpus. Concretely, we firstly generate multiple pseudo QA pairs with background passages and one-sentence explanations for these QAs by prompting LLMs step by step and then leverage the generated QA pairs for in-context learning. Experimental results show our method surpasses previous state-of-the-art methods by +8.8 EM averagely on three widely-used ODQA datasets, and even achieves comparable performance with several retrieval-augmented fine-tuned models.

在有问题的回答需要常识的问题上，语言模型（例如，GPT-3）已用于生成表达有助于提高性能的背景知识的文本。然而，使用此类模型的成本很高。在这项工作中，我们对较小的语言模型产生有用的中间上下文，此处称为阐述。我们的框架在更新两个语言模型之间交替使用 - 阐述生成器和一个答案预测变量 - 允许每个语言都影响彼此。我们的模型使用少于GPT-3的参数的0.5％优于具有相似尺寸的替代方案，并在四个常识性问题上回答基准测试的GPT-3上的差距缩小。人类评估表明，生成的阐述的质量很高。

This paper proposes a question-answering system that can answer questions whose supporting evidence is spread over multiple (potentially long) documents. The system, called Visconde, uses a three-step pipeline to perform the task: decompose, retrieve, and aggregate. The first step decomposes the question into simpler questions using a few-shot large language model (LLM). Then, a state-of-the-art search engine is used to retrieve candidate passages from a large collection for each decomposed question. In the final step, we use the LLM in a few-shot setting to aggregate the contents of the passages into the final answer. The system is evaluated on three datasets: IIRC, Qasper, and StrategyQA. Results suggest that current retrievers are the main bottleneck and that readers are already performing at the human level as long as relevant passages are provided. The system is also shown to be more effective when the model is induced to give explanations before answering a question. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/neuralmind-ai/visconde}.

预训练的语言模型（PTLM）已显示出在自然语言任务上表现良好。许多先前的作品都以通过知识图（KGS）标记的关系链接的实体的形式利用结构性常识来协助PTLM。检索方法使用kg作为单独的静态模块，该模块限制了覆盖范围，因为kgs包含有限的知识。生成方法训练PTLMS kg三倍以提高获得知识的规模。但是，对符号KG实体的培训限制了其在涉及自然语言文本的任务中的适用性，在这些任务中，它们忽略了整体上下文。为了减轻这种情况，我们提出了一个以句子为条件的常识性上下文化器（COSE-CO）作为输入，以使其在生成与输入文本的整体上下文相关的任务中通常可用。为了训练Cose-Co，我们提出了一个新的数据集，其中包括句子和常识知识对。 COSE-CO推断出的知识是多种多样的，并且包含了基础KG中不存在的新实体。我们增强了在多选质量质量检查和开放式常识性推理任务中产生的知识，从而改善了CSQA，ARC，QASC和OBQA数据集的当前最佳方法。我们还展示了其在改善释义生成任务的基线模型方面的适用性。

知识密集型任务，例如开放域问题答案（QA），需要访问大量的世界知识或领域知识。知识密集型任务的一种常见方法是采用检索到阅读的管道，该管道首先从诸如Wikipedia之类的外部语料库中检索少数相关的上下文文档，然后预测在检索文档的条件下得到答案。在本文中，我们提出了一种新的观点，可以通过用大型语言模型生成器代替文档检索器来解决知识密集型任务。我们称我们的方法生成-Read Read（GenRead），该方法首先提示大型语言模型根据给定问题生成上下文文档，然后读取生成的文档以产生最终答案。此外，我们提出了一种基于聚类的提示方法，该方法选择了不同的提示，从而产生了涵盖不同观点的生成文档，从而更好地回忆了可接受的答案。我们对三个不同的知识密集任务进行了广泛的实验，包括开放域质量检查，事实检查和对话系统。值得注意的是，GenRead在Triviaqa和WebQ上实现了71.6和54.4的精确匹配分数，显着超过了最先进的检索到+4.0和+3.9的最先进的dpr-fid，而无需从任何外部知识源中检索任何文档。最后，我们证明可以通过结合检索和生成来进一步提高模型性能。

Recent work has shown that large language models are capable of generating natural language reasoning steps or Chains-of-Thoughts (CoT) to answer a multi-step question when prompted to do so. This is insufficient, however, when the necessary knowledge is not available or up-to-date within a model's parameters. A straightforward approach to address this is to retrieve text from an external knowledge source using the question as a query and prepend it as context to the model's input. This, however, is also insufficient for multi-step QA where \textit{what to retrieve} depends on \textit{what has already been derived}. To address this issue we propose IRCoT, a new approach that interleaves retrieval with CoT for multi-step QA, guiding the retrieval with CoT and in turn using retrieved results to improve CoT. Our experiments with GPT3 show substantial improvements in retrieval (up to 22 points) and downstream QA (up to 16 points) over the baselines on four datasets: HotpotQA, 2WikiMultihopQA, MuSiQue, and IIRC. Notably, our method also works well for much smaller models such as T5-Flan-large (0.7B) without any additional training.

大型基于变压器的预训练的语言模型在各种知识密集的任务上取得了令人印象深刻的表现，并可以在其参数中捕获事实知识。我们认为，考虑到不断增长的知识和资源需求，在模型参数中存储大量知识是亚最佳选择。我们认为，更有效的替代方法是向模型提供对上下文相关的结构化知识的明确访问，并训练它以使用该知识。我们提出了LM核 - 实现这一目标的一般框架 - 允许从外部知识源对语言模型培训的\ textit {解耦}，并允许后者更新而不会影响已经训练的模型。实验结果表明，LM核心获得外部知识，在知识探索任务上的最先进的知识增强语言模型中实现了重要而强大的优于性能。可以有效处理知识更新；并在两个下游任务上表现良好。我们还提出了一个彻底的错误分析，突出了LM核的成功和失败。

Language models (LMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on downstream tasks, using in-context exemplars or human instructions. Recent works have shown that chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting can elicit models to solve complex reasoning tasks, step-by-step. However, the efficacy of prompt-based CoT methods is restricted to very large LMs such as GPT-3 (175B), thus limiting deployability. In this paper, we revisit the fine-tuning approach to enable complex reasoning in smaller LMs, optimized to efficiently perform a specific task. We propose Fine-tune-CoT, a method that leverages the capabilities of very large LMs to generate reasoning samples and teach smaller models via fine-tuning. We evaluate our method on publicly available LMs across a wide range of complex tasks and model sizes. We find that Fine-tune-CoT enables substantial reasoning capability in small models, whereas previous prompt-based baselines exhibit near-random performance. Student models can even outperform the teacher in some tasks while reducing model size requirements by several orders of magnitude. We conduct extensive ablations and sample studies to understand the reasoning capabilities of student models. We also identify several important nuances that have been overlooked in concurrent fine-tuning works on CoT and address them in our analysis.

最近的研究表明，理性或逐步思想链可用于改善多步推理任务的性能。我们重新考虑了理由的提示，提示了几次射击中的内部学习学习，其中（输入 - >输出）提示将扩展到（输入，理由 - >输出）提示。对于以理由为提示的提示，我们证明了现有的方法（依赖手动及时工程）如何受到可能损害绩效的次级理由。为了减轻这种脆弱性，我们提出了一个统一的授权合奏的统一框架，在该框架中，我们将输出空间中的理由抽样确定为可鲁棒提高性能的关键组成部分。该框架是一般的，可以轻松地扩展到常见的自然语言处理任务，即使传统上不利于中间步骤的任务，例如问题回答，单词感官歧义和情感分析。我们证明，与现有的提示方法相比，以理由为原理的合奏获得了更准确和可解释的结果 - 包括标准提示，没有理由和基于理由的链链链，同时通过相关理性同时提高了模型预测的解释性。

预测任务标签和为其预测生成自由文本阐述的自律化模型可以实现与NLP系统更直观的交互。然而，这些模型目前正在接受大量人为的自由文本解释，每个任务都会阻碍更广泛的使用。我们建议使用少数培训例子研究更现实的自律化建立。我们出示2月 - 一个标准化的四个现有英语数据集和相关指标。我们通过2月份广泛探索自然语言提示来确定正确的提示方法。然后，通过使用此提示并缩放模型大小，我们证明了几次拍摄自合合理化的进展。我们展示了这项任务的完善房间仍然有充足的改进空间：人类注册人评估的生成解释的平均合理性最多为51％，而人类解释的合理性是76％。我们希望2月份与我们的拟议方法一起促使社区承担几次拍摄的自我合理化挑战。

GPT-3和Palm等大型语言模型在几次学习中表现出色。但是，他们仍然在推理任务（例如算术基准GSM8K）上挣扎。最近的进步故意指导语言模型在产生最终答案之前生成一系列推理步骤，从而成功地将GSM8K基准从17.9％提高到58.1％，以解决问题的解决率。在本文中，我们提出了一种新的方法，即多样化的方法（关于推理步骤的多样化验证者），以进一步提高其推理能力。多样性首先探索不同的提示，以增强推理路径的多样性。其次，Diverse介绍了一个验证者，以区分好的答案和不良答案，从而获得更好的权重投票。最后，多样性验证每个步骤的正确性，而不是整体上的所有步骤。我们使用最新的语言型号Davinci-002进行广泛的实验，并证明多样化可以在八分之六的推理基准中实现新的最先进的性能（例如，GSM8K 74.4％至83.2％），超过棕榈具有540B参数的模型。

我们提出了一种系统推理的方法，该方法生产了基于事实基础的人类可解释的证明树。我们的解决方案类似于经典的基于序言的推理引擎的风格，在该引擎中，我们通过神经语言建模，指导生成和半磁头密集检索的结合来代替手工制作的规则。这款新颖的推理引擎Nellie动态实例化了可解释的推理规则，这些规则捕获和分数构成（DE）在自然语言陈述上。内莉（Nellie）在科学质量检查数据集上提供竞争性能，需要对多个事实进行结构化解释。

致致辞问题答案（CQA）旨在测试模型是否可以回答有关每个人都知道的勤杂朗语言的问题。结合外部知识库的事先作品已经显示了有希望的结果，但知识库是昂贵的构造，并且通常限于固定的一组关系。在本文中，我们专注于更好地利用\ Texit {隐式知识}存储在预先接受预先接受的语言模型中。虽然研究人员发现嵌入在预先接受预先训练的语言模型中的知识，但可以通过填写仔细设计的提取和文本分类的谨慎设计的空白来提取，但如果我们可以在输入和输入的CQA中采用此范例，仍然不清楚输出采取更灵活的形式。为此，我们调查了四种翻译方法，可以将自然问题转化为渗出风格的句子，从语言模型中更好地征求致辞知识，包括基于句法的模型，无监督的神经模型和两个监督的神经模型。此外，要结合不同的翻译方法，我们建议鼓励模型预测与未标记数据不同翻译问题的一致性。我们展示了我们在零拍摄设置中三个CQA数据集上的方法的有效性。我们表明，我们的方法与知识库改进的模型互补，并结合它们可以导致最先进的零射击性能。分析还揭示了不同的强化翻译方法的明显特征，并为什么结合它们导致巨大改进提供了洞察。

As large language models (LLMs) grow larger and more sophisticated, assessing their "reasoning" capabilities in natural language grows more challenging. Recent question answering (QA) benchmarks that attempt to assess reasoning are often limited by a narrow scope of covered situations and subject matters. We introduce WikiWhy, a QA dataset built around a novel auxiliary task: explaining why an answer is true in natural language. WikiWhy contains over 9,000 "why" question-answer-rationale triples, grounded on Wikipedia facts across a diverse set of topics. Each rationale is a set of supporting statements connecting the question to the answer. WikiWhy serves as a benchmark for the reasoning capabilities of LLMs because it demands rigorous explicit rationales for each answer to demonstrate the acquisition of implicit commonsense knowledge, which is unlikely to be easily memorized. GPT-3 baselines achieve only 38.7% human-evaluated correctness in the end-to-end answer & explain condition, leaving significant room for future improvements.

最近与大型变压器的主要工作的主要重点是优化包装到模型参数中的信息量。在这项工作中，我们问了一个不同的问题：多峰变压器可以在他们推理中利用明确的知识吗？现有，主要是单峰，方法在知识检索范例下探讨了方法，随后回答预测，但留下了关于所使用的检索知识的质量和相关性的开放性问题，以及如何集成隐含和明确知识的推理过程。为了解决这些挑战，我们提出了一种新颖的模型 - 知识增强变压器（KAT） - 在OK-VQA的开放式多模式任务上实现了强大的最先进的结果（+6分）。我们的方法在结束到终端编码器 - 解码器架构中集成了隐式和显式知识，同时在答案生成期间仍然共同推理了两个知识源。在我们分析中提高了模型预测的可解释性，可以看到明确知识集成的额外好处。