独立测试在观察数据中的统计和因果推断中起着核心作用。标准独立测试假定数据样本是独立的，并且分布相同（i.i.d。），但是在以关系系统为中心的许多现实世界数据集和应用中违反了该假设。这项工作通过为影响个人实例的一组观测值定义足够的观察表，研究了从关系系统中估算独立性的问题。具体而言，我们通过将内核平均嵌入为关系变量的灵活聚合函数来定义关系数据的边际和条件独立性测试。我们提出了一个一致的，非参数，可扩展的内核测试，以对非I.I.D的关系独立性测试进行操作。一组结构假设下的观察数据。我们在经验上对各种合成和半合成网络进行了经验评估我们提出的方法，并证明了与基于最新内核的独立性测试相比其有效性。

We propose a framework for analyzing and comparing distributions, which we use to construct statistical tests to determine if two samples are drawn from different distributions. Our test statistic is the largest difference in expectations over functions in the unit ball of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), and is called the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). We present two distributionfree tests based on large deviation bounds for the MMD, and a third test based on the asymptotic distribution of this statistic. The MMD can be computed in quadratic time, although efficient linear time approximations are available. Our statistic is an instance of an integral probability metric, and various classical metrics on distributions are obtained when alternative function classes are used in place of an RKHS. We apply our two-sample tests to a variety of problems, including attribute matching for databases using the Hungarian marriage method, where they perform strongly. Excellent performance is also obtained when comparing distributions over graphs, for which these are the first such tests.

随着混凝剂的数量增加，因果推理越来越复杂。给定护理$ x $，混淆器$ z $和结果$ y $，我们开发一个非参数方法来测试\ texit {do-null}假设$ h_0：\; p（y | \ text {\它do}（x = x））= p（y）$违反替代方案。在Hilbert Schmidt独立性标准（HSIC）上进行边缘独立性测试，我们提出了后门 - HSIC（BD-HSIC）并证明它被校准，并且在大量混淆下具有二元和连续治疗的力量。此外，我们建立了BD-HSIC中使用的协方差运算符的估计的收敛性质。我们研究了BD-HSIC对参数测试的优点和缺点以及与边缘独立测试或有条件独立测试相比使用DO-NULL测试的重要性。可以在\超链接{https:/github.com/mrhuff/kgformula} {\ texttt {https://github.com/mrhuff/kgformula}}完整的实现。

Testing the significance of a variable or group of variables $X$ for predicting a response $Y$, given additional covariates $Z$, is a ubiquitous task in statistics. A simple but common approach is to specify a linear model, and then test whether the regression coefficient for $X$ is non-zero. However, when the model is misspecified, the test may have poor power, for example when $X$ is involved in complex interactions, or lead to many false rejections. In this work we study the problem of testing the model-free null of conditional mean independence, i.e. that the conditional mean of $Y$ given $X$ and $Z$ does not depend on $X$. We propose a simple and general framework that can leverage flexible nonparametric or machine learning methods, such as additive models or random forests, to yield both robust error control and high power. The procedure involves using these methods to perform regressions, first to estimate a form of projection of $Y$ on $X$ and $Z$ using one half of the data, and then to estimate the expected conditional covariance between this projection and $Y$ on the remaining half of the data. While the approach is general, we show that a version of our procedure using spline regression achieves what we show is the minimax optimal rate in this nonparametric testing problem. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach both in terms of maintaining Type I error control, and power, compared to several existing approaches.

我们提出了一项新的条件依赖度量和有条件独立性的统计检验。该度量基于在有限位置评估的两个合理分布的分析内嵌入之间的差异。我们在条件独立性的无效假设下获得其渐近分布，并从中设计一致的统计检验。我们进行了一系列实验，表明我们的新测试在I型和类型II误差方面都超过了最先进的方法，即使在高维设置中也是如此。

A common approach to modeling networks assigns each node to a position on a low-dimensional manifold where distance is inversely proportional to connection likelihood. More positive manifold curvature encourages more and tighter communities; negative curvature induces repulsion. We consistently estimate manifold type, dimension, and curvature from simply connected, complete Riemannian manifolds of constant curvature. We represent the graph as a noisy distance matrix based on the ties between cliques, then develop hypothesis tests to determine whether the observed distances could plausibly be embedded isometrically in each of the candidate geometries. We apply our approach to data-sets from economics and neuroscience.

我们在右审查的生存时间和协变量之间介绍一般的非参数独立测试，这可能是多变量的。我们的测试统计数据具有双重解释，首先是潜在无限的重量索引日志秩检验的超级索引，具有属于函数的再现内核HILBERT空间（RKHS）的重量函数;其次，作为某些有限措施的嵌入差异的规范，与Hilbert-Schmidt独立性标准（HSIC）测试统计类似。我们研究了测试的渐近性质，找到了足够的条件，以确保我们的测试在任何替代方案下正确拒绝零假设。可以直截了当地计算测试统计，并且通过渐近总体的野外自注程序进行拒绝阈值。对模拟和实际数据的广泛调查表明，我们的测试程序通常比检测复杂的非线性依赖的竞争方法更好。

Causal inference is the process of using assumptions, study designs, and estimation strategies to draw conclusions about the causal relationships between variables based on data. This allows researchers to better understand the underlying mechanisms at work in complex systems and make more informed decisions. In many settings, we may not fully observe all the confounders that affect both the treatment and outcome variables, complicating the estimation of causal effects. To address this problem, a growing literature in both causal inference and machine learning proposes to use Instrumental Variables (IV). This paper serves as the first effort to systematically and comprehensively introduce and discuss the IV methods and their applications in both causal inference and machine learning. First, we provide the formal definition of IVs and discuss the identification problem of IV regression methods under different assumptions. Second, we categorize the existing work on IV methods into three streams according to the focus on the proposed methods, including two-stage least squares with IVs, control function with IVs, and evaluation of IVs. For each stream, we present both the classical causal inference methods, and recent developments in the machine learning literature. Then, we introduce a variety of applications of IV methods in real-world scenarios and provide a summary of the available datasets and algorithms. Finally, we summarize the literature, discuss the open problems and suggest promising future research directions for IV methods and their applications. We also develop a toolkit of IVs methods reviewed in this survey at https://github.com/causal-machine-learning-lab/mliv.

Pre-publication draft of a book to be published byMorgan & Claypool publishers. Unedited version released with permission. All relevant copyrights held by the author and publisher extend to this pre-publication draft.

In nonparametric independence testing, we observe i.i.d.\ data $\{(X_i,Y_i)\}_{i=1}^n$, where $X \in \mathcal{X}, Y \in \mathcal{Y}$ lie in any general spaces, and we wish to test the null that $X$ is independent of $Y$. Modern test statistics such as the kernel Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) and Distance Covariance (dCov) have intractable null distributions due to the degeneracy of the underlying U-statistics. Thus, in practice, one often resorts to using permutation testing, which provides a nonasymptotic guarantee at the expense of recalculating the quadratic-time statistics (say) a few hundred times. This paper provides a simple but nontrivial modification of HSIC and dCov (called xHSIC and xdCov, pronounced ``cross'' HSIC/dCov) so that they have a limiting Gaussian distribution under the null, and thus do not require permutations. This requires building on the newly developed theory of cross U-statistics by Kim and Ramdas (2020), and in particular developing several nontrivial extensions of the theory in Shekhar et al. (2022), which developed an analogous permutation-free kernel two-sample test. We show that our new tests, like the originals, are consistent against fixed alternatives, and minimax rate optimal against smooth local alternatives. Numerical simulations demonstrate that compared to the full dCov or HSIC, our variants have the same power up to a $\sqrt 2$ factor, giving practitioners a new option for large problems or data-analysis pipelines where computation, not sample size, could be the bottleneck.

在非参数环境中，因果结构通常仅在马尔可夫等效性上可识别，并且出于因果推断的目的，学习马尔可夫等效类（MEC）的图形表示很有用。在本文中，我们重新审视了贪婪的等效搜索（GES）算法，该算法被广泛引用为一种基于分数的算法，用于学习基本因果结构的MEC。我们观察到，为了使GES算法在非参数设置中保持一致，不必设计评估图的评分度量。取而代之的是，足以插入有条件依赖度量的一致估计器来指导搜索。因此，我们提出了GES算法的重塑，该算法比基于标准分数的版本更灵活，并且很容易将自己带到非参数设置，并具有条件依赖性的一般度量。此外，我们提出了一种神经条件依赖性（NCD）度量，该措施利用深神经网络的表达能力以非参数方式表征条件独立性。我们根据标准假设建立了重新构架GES算法的最佳性，并使用我们的NCD估计器来决定条件独立性的一致性。这些结果共同证明了拟议的方法。实验结果证明了我们方法在因果发现中的有效性，以及使用我们的NCD度量而不是基于内核的措施的优势。

Network-based analyses of dynamical systems have become increasingly popular in climate science. Here we address network construction from a statistical perspective and highlight the often ignored fact that the calculated correlation values are only empirical estimates. To measure spurious behaviour as deviation from a ground truth network, we simulate time-dependent isotropic random fields on the sphere and apply common network construction techniques. We find several ways in which the uncertainty stemming from the estimation procedure has major impact on network characteristics. When the data has locally coherent correlation structure, spurious link bundle teleconnections and spurious high-degree clusters have to be expected. Anisotropic estimation variance can also induce severe biases into empirical networks. We validate our findings with ERA5 reanalysis data. Moreover we explain why commonly applied resampling procedures are inappropriate for significance evaluation and propose a statistically more meaningful ensemble construction framework. By communicating which difficulties arise in estimation from scarce data and by presenting which design decisions increase robustness, we hope to contribute to more reliable climate network construction in the future.

Classical asymptotic theory for statistical inference usually involves calibrating a statistic by fixing the dimension $d$ while letting the sample size $n$ increase to infinity. Recently, much effort has been dedicated towards understanding how these methods behave in high-dimensional settings, where $d$ and $n$ both increase to infinity together. This often leads to different inference procedures, depending on the assumptions about the dimensionality, leaving the practitioner in a bind: given a dataset with 100 samples in 20 dimensions, should they calibrate by assuming $n \gg d$, or $d/n \approx 0.2$? This paper considers the goal of dimension-agnostic inference; developing methods whose validity does not depend on any assumption on $d$ versus $n$. We introduce an approach that uses variational representations of existing test statistics along with sample splitting and self-normalization to produce a new test statistic with a Gaussian limiting distribution, regardless of how $d$ scales with $n$. The resulting statistic can be viewed as a careful modification of degenerate U-statistics, dropping diagonal blocks and retaining off-diagonal blocks. We exemplify our technique for some classical problems including one-sample mean and covariance testing, and show that our tests have minimax rate-optimal power against appropriate local alternatives. In most settings, our cross U-statistic matches the high-dimensional power of the corresponding (degenerate) U-statistic up to a $\sqrt{2}$ factor.

在本文中，我们研究了高维条件独立测试，统计和机器学习中的关键构建块问题。我们提出了一种基于双生成对抗性网络（GANS）的推理程序。具体来说，我们首先介绍双GANS框架来学习两个发电机的条件分布。然后，我们将这两个生成器集成到构造测试统计，这采用多个转换函数的广义协方差措施的最大形式。我们还采用了数据分割和交叉拟合来最小化发电机上的条件，以实现所需的渐近属性，并采用乘法器引导来获得相应的$ P $ -Value。我们表明，构造的测试统计数据是双重稳健的，并且由此产生的测试既逆向I误差，并具有渐近的电源。同样的是，与现有测试相比，我们建立了较弱和实际上更可行的条件下的理论保障，我们的提案提供了如何利用某些最先进的深层学习工具（如GAN）的具体示例帮助解决古典但具有挑战性的统计问题。我们通过模拟和应用于抗癌药物数据集来证明我们的测试的疗效。在https://github.com/tianlinxu312/dgcit上提供了所提出的程序的Python实现。

治疗效应估计的因果推理方法通常假设独立的实验单位。但是，由于实验单元可能会相互作用，因此这种假设通常值得怀疑。我们开发了增强的反可能性加权（AIPW），以估计和推断因果治疗对依赖观察数据的影响。我们的框架涵盖了网络中相互作用的单位引起的溢出效应的非常普遍的案例。我们使用插件机学习来估计无限维的滋扰成分，导致一致的治疗效应估计器以参数速率收敛，渐近地遵循高斯分布。

仪器变量模型使我们能够确定协变量$ x $和响应$ y $之间的因果功能，即使在存在未观察到的混淆的情况下。大多数现有估计器都假定响应$ y $和隐藏混杂因素中的错误项与仪器$ z $不相关。这通常是由图形分离的动机，这一论点也证明了独立性。但是，提出独立限制会导致严格的可识别性结果。我们连接到计量经济学的现有文献，并提供了一种称为HSIC-X的实用方法，用于利用独立性，可以与任何基于梯度的学习程序结合使用。我们看到，即使在可识别的设置中，考虑到更高的矩可能会产生更好的有限样本结果。此外，我们利用独立性进行分布泛化。我们证明，只要这些移位足够强，拟议的估计器对于仪器的分布变化和最佳案例最佳变化是不变的。这些结果即使在未识别的情况下也能够得出这些结果，即仪器不足以识别因果功能。

因果关系是理解世界的科学努力的基本组成部分。不幸的是，在心理学和社会科学中，因果关系仍然是禁忌。由于越来越多的建议采用因果方法进行研究的重要性，我们重新制定了心理学研究方法的典型方法，以使不可避免的因果理论与其余的研究渠道协调。我们提出了一个新的过程，该过程始于从因果发现和机器学习的融合中纳入技术的发展，验证和透明的理论形式规范。然后，我们提出将完全指定的理论模型的复杂性降低到与给定目标假设相关的基本子模型中的方法。从这里，我们确定利息量是否可以从数据中估算出来，如果是的，则建议使用半参数机器学习方法来估计因果关系。总体目标是介绍新的研究管道，该管道可以（a）促进与测试因果理论的愿望兼容的科学询问（b）鼓励我们的理论透明代表作为明确的数学对象，（c）将我们的统计模型绑定到我们的统计模型中该理论的特定属性，因此减少了理论到模型间隙通常引起的规范不足问题，以及（d）产生因果关系和可重复性的结果和估计。通过具有现实世界数据的教学示例来证明该过程，我们以摘要和讨论来结论。

我们提出了对学度校正随机块模型（DCSBM）的合适性测试。该测试基于调整后的卡方统计量，用于测量$ n $多项式分布的组之间的平等性，该分布具有$ d_1，\ dots，d_n $观测值。在网络模型的背景下，多项式的数量（$ n $）的数量比观测值数量（$ d_i $）快得多，与节点$ i $的度相对应，因此设置偏离了经典的渐近学。我们表明，只要$ \ {d_i \} $的谐波平均值生长到无穷大，就可以使统计量在NULL下分配。顺序应用时，该测试也可以用于确定社区数量。该测试在邻接矩阵的压缩版本上进行操作，因此在学位上有条件，因此对大型稀疏网络具有高度可扩展性。我们结合了一个新颖的想法，即在测试$ K $社区时根据$（k+1）$ - 社区分配来压缩行。这种方法在不牺牲计算效率的情况下增加了顺序应用中的力量，我们证明了它在恢复社区数量方面的一致性。由于测试统计量不依赖于特定的替代方案，因此其效用超出了顺序测试，可用于同时测试DCSBM家族以外的各种替代方案。特别是，我们证明该测试与具有社区结构的潜在可变性网络模型的一般家庭一致。

A common assumption in causal inference from observational data is that there is no hidden confounding. Yet it is, in general, impossible to verify the presence of hidden confounding factors from a single dataset. Under the assumption of independent causal mechanisms underlying the data generating process, we demonstrate a way to detect unobserved confounders when having multiple observational datasets coming from different environments. We present a theory for testable conditional independencies that are only absent during hidden confounding and examine cases where we violate its assumptions: degenerate & dependent mechanisms, and faithfulness violations. Additionally, we propose a procedure to test these independencies and study its empirical finite-sample behavior using simulation studies and semi-synthetic data based on a real-world dataset. In most cases, our theory correctly predicts the presence of hidden confounding, particularly when the confounding bias is~large.

由于其出色的经验表现，随机森林是过去十年中使用的机器学习方法之一。然而，由于其黑框的性质，在许多大数据应用中很难解释随机森林的结果。量化各个特征在随机森林中的实用性可以大大增强其解释性。现有的研究表明，一些普遍使用的特征对随机森林的重要性措施遭受了偏见问题。此外，对于大多数现有方法，缺乏全面的规模和功率分析。在本文中，我们通过假设检验解决了问题，并提出了一个自由化特征 - 弥散性相关测试（事实）的框架，以评估具有偏见性属性的随机森林模型中给定特征的重要性，我们零假设涉及该特征是否与所有其他特征有条件地独立于响应。关于高维随机森林一致性的一些最新发展，对随机森林推断的这种努力得到了赋予的能力。在存在功能依赖性的情况下，我们的事实测试的香草版可能会遇到偏见问题。我们利用偏置校正的不平衡和调节技术。我们通过增强功率的功能转换将合奏的想法进一步纳入事实统计范围。在相当普遍的具有依赖特征的高维非参数模型设置下，我们正式确定事实可以提供理论上合理的随机森林具有P值，并通过非催化分析享受吸引人的力量。新建议的方法的理论结果和有限样本优势通过几个模拟示例和与Covid-19的经济预测应用进行了说明。