我们介绍了作为创建高质量的，对抗机器阅读透明数据的注释，用于为动态对抗数据收集（DADC）的第一个研讨会的提取质量检查数据。DADC是一个新兴的数据收集范式，循环中都有模型和人类。我们设置了准实验注释设计，并对各组进行定量分析，这些分析量不同，这些注释者重点是成功的对抗攻击，成本分析和注释者置信度相关。鉴于我们数据集中的段落的不同主题，我们进一步对我们对任务的困难进行了定性分析，并以建议和建议对从事未来DADC任务和相关注释接口的人们可能有价值。

为了实现长文档理解的构建和测试模型，我们引入质量，具有中文段的多项选择QA DataSet，具有约5,000个令牌的平均长度，比典型的当前模型更长。与经过段落的事先工作不同，我们的问题是由阅读整个段落的贡献者编写和验证的，而不是依赖摘要或摘录。此外，只有一半的问题是通过在紧缩时间限制下工作的注释器来应答，表明略读和简单的搜索不足以一直表现良好。目前的模型在此任务上表现不佳（55.4％），并且落后于人类性能（93.5％）。

开发对手挑战NLP系统的方法是提高模型性能和解释性的有前途的途径。在这里，我们描述了团队在第一个动态对抗数据收集（DADC）的任务1中“长角牛”的方法，该研讨会要求团队手动欺骗一个模型，以挖掘出挖掘的问题回答任务。我们的团队首先结束，模型错误率为62％。我们主张采用系统的，语言知情的方法来制定对抗性问题，并描述了试点实验的结果以及我们的官方提交。

在动态对抗数据收集（DADC）中，人类的注释者是任务的，找到模型努力预测的示例。已经显示出在达克收集的训练数据上培训的模型在对抗和域外设置方面更加强大，并且对于人类来说更难愚弄。然而，DADC比传统数据收集更耗时，因此每个示例更昂贵。在这项工作中，我们检查我们是否可以保持DADC的优势，而不会遭受额外的成本。为此，我们引入了生成的注释助理（GaAs），生成的循环模型，提供了注释器完全批准，修改或拒绝的实时建议。我们在20个实验设置中收集培训数据集，并对这种方法进行详细分析，用于标准和对冲数据收集的提取问题应答（QA）的任务。我们展示了GaAs在注释速度方面提供了显着的效率效益，同时导致改善模型愚蠢的速率。此外，我们还表明，GaA辅助数据在回答任务的各种问题上导致更高的下游模型性能。

包含布尔问题的现有数据集（如Booolq和Tydi QA）为用户提供对问题的是/否响应。然而，一个单词响应不足以可说明的系统。我们通过释放一组标记现有TYDI QA和Booolq数据集的证据的新辅助来促进解释性。我们表明，与依赖现有资源的模型相比，我们的注释可用于培训提取改进证据跨度的模型。我们通过用户学习确认我们的调查结果表明我们提取的证据涵盖了增强用户体验。我们还提供进一步了解回答布尔问题的挑战，例如包含冲突的是和无答案的段落，以及预测证据的不同程度。

会话问题应答（CQA）系统旨在为用户提供自然语言答案，以信息寻求对话。现有的CQA基准测试与预先收集的人类谈话进行比较模型，使用在会话历史中提供的地面真理答案。它仍然尚不清楚我们是否可以依赖于模型开发的这种静态评估，以及当前系统是否能够充分地概括为现实世界的人机对话。在这项工作中，我们开展了最先进的CQA系统的大规模人类评估，人类评估人员与模型交谈并判断了答案的正确性。我们发现，人机对话的分布与人类谈话的分配急剧不同，并且在模型排名方面存在人和金历史评估之间的分歧。我们进一步调查了如何改进自动评估，并提出基于预测历史的问题重写机制，与人类判断更好地相关。最后，我们讨论了各种建模策略和未来方向对更好的会话问题应答系统的影响。

We introduce a new large-scale NLI benchmark dataset, collected via an iterative, adversarial human-and-model-in-the-loop procedure. We show that training models on this new dataset leads to state-of-the-art performance on a variety of popular NLI benchmarks, while posing a more difficult challenge with its new test set. Our analysis sheds light on the shortcomings of current state-of-theart models, and shows that non-expert annotators are successful at finding their weaknesses. The data collection method can be applied in a never-ending learning scenario, becoming a moving target for NLU, rather than a static benchmark that will quickly saturate.

随着近期自然语言生成（NLG）模型的各种应用程序的改进，它变得必须具有识别和评估NLG输出是否仅共享关于外部世界的可验证信息的手段。在这项工作中，我们提出了一个归属于识别的来源（AIS）的新评估框架，用于评估自然语言生成模型的输出，当这种输出涉及外部世界时。我们首先定义AIS，并引入两级注释管道，用于允许注释器根据AIS指南适当地评估模型输出。通过人为评估研究，我们在三个代数据集（会话QA域中的两个中和总结一下，概括地验证了这种方法，表明AIS可以作为测量模型生成的语句是否支持基础来源的常见框架。我们释放人类评估研究指南。

Humans gather information through conversations involving a series of interconnected questions and answers. For machines to assist in information gathering, it is therefore essential to enable them to answer conversational questions. We introduce CoQA, a novel dataset for building Conversational Question Answering systems. 1 Our dataset contains 127k questions with answers, obtained from 8k conversations about text passages from seven diverse domains. The questions are conversational, and the answers are free-form text with their corresponding evidence highlighted in the passage. We analyze CoQA in depth and show that conversational questions have challenging phenomena not present in existing reading comprehension datasets, e.g., coreference and pragmatic reasoning. We evaluate strong dialogue and reading comprehension models on CoQA. The best system obtains an F1 score of 65.4%, which is 23.4 points behind human performance (88.8%), indicating there is ample room for improvement. We present CoQA as a challenge to the community at https://stanfordnlp. github.io/coqa.

The need for Question Answering datasets in low resource languages is the motivation of this research, leading to the development of Kencorpus Swahili Question Answering Dataset, KenSwQuAD. This dataset is annotated from raw story texts of Swahili low resource language, which is a predominantly spoken in Eastern African and in other parts of the world. Question Answering (QA) datasets are important for machine comprehension of natural language for tasks such as internet search and dialog systems. Machine learning systems need training data such as the gold standard Question Answering set developed in this research. The research engaged annotators to formulate QA pairs from Swahili texts collected by the Kencorpus project, a Kenyan languages corpus. The project annotated 1,445 texts from the total 2,585 texts with at least 5 QA pairs each, resulting into a final dataset of 7,526 QA pairs. A quality assurance set of 12.5% of the annotated texts confirmed that the QA pairs were all correctly annotated. A proof of concept on applying the set to the QA task confirmed that the dataset can be usable for such tasks. KenSwQuAD has also contributed to resourcing of the Swahili language.

虽然通过简单的因素问题回答，文本理解的大量进展，但更加全面理解话语仍然存在重大挑战。批判性地反映出文本的人将造成好奇心驱动，通常是开放的问题，这反映了对内容的深刻理解，并要求复杂的推理来回答。建立和评估这种类型的话语理解模型的关键挑战是缺乏注释数据，特别是因为找到了这些问题的答案（可能根本不回答），需要高度的注释载荷的高认知负荷。本文提出了一种新的范式，使可扩展的数据收集能够针对新闻文件的理解，通过话语镜头查看这些问题。由此产生的语料库DCQA（疑问回答的话语理解）包括在607名英语文件中的22,430个问题答案对组成。 DCQA以自由形式，开放式问题的形式捕获句子之间的话语和语义链接。在评估集中，我们向问题上的问题提交了来自好奇数据集的问题，我们表明DCQA提供了有价值的监督，以回答开放式问题。我们还在使用现有的问答资源设计预训练方法，并使用合成数据来适应不可批售的问题。

Question Answering (QA) is a growing area of research, often used to facilitate the extraction of information from within documents. State-of-the-art QA models are usually pre-trained on domain-general corpora like Wikipedia and thus tend to struggle on out-of-domain documents without fine-tuning. We demonstrate that synthetic domain-specific datasets can be generated easily using domain-general models, while still providing significant improvements to QA performance. We present two new tools for this task: A flexible pipeline for validating the synthetic QA data and training downstream models on it, and an online interface to facilitate human annotation of this generated data. Using this interface, crowdworkers labelled 1117 synthetic QA pairs, which we then used to fine-tune downstream models and improve domain-specific QA performance by 8.75 F1.

可解释的NLP（EXNLP）越来越关注收集人类注释的文本解释。这些解释在三种方面使用下游：作为数据增强，以提高预测任务的性能，因为对培训模型的监督，为他们的预测产生解释，以及评估模型生成的解释的理论。在本次审查中，我们识别65个具有三个主要类别的文本解释的数据集（突出显示，自由文本和结构），组织关于注释每种类型的文献，识别现有收集方法的优势和缺点，并为收集EXNLP数据集提供建议在将来。

有关应答数据集和模型的研究在研究界中获得了很多关注。其中许多人释放了自己的问题应答数据集以及模型。我们在该研究领域看到了巨大的进展。本调查的目的是识别，总结和分析许多研究人员释放的现有数据集，尤其是在非英语数据集以及研究代码和评估指标等资源中。在本文中，我们审查了问题应答数据集，这些数据集可以以法语，德语，日语，中文，阿拉伯语，俄语以及多语言和交叉的问答数据集进行英语。

Recently proposed systems for open-domain question answering (OpenQA) require large amounts of training data to achieve state-of-the-art performance. However, data annotation is known to be time-consuming and therefore expensive to acquire. As a result, the appropriate datasets are available only for a handful of languages (mainly English and Chinese). In this work, we introduce and publicly release PolQA, the first Polish dataset for OpenQA. It consists of 7,000 questions, 87,525 manually labeled evidence passages, and a corpus of over 7,097,322 candidate passages. Each question is classified according to its formulation, type, as well as entity type of the answer. This resource allows us to evaluate the impact of different annotation choices on the performance of the QA system and propose an efficient annotation strategy that increases the passage retrieval performance by 10.55 p.p. while reducing the annotation cost by 82%.

In the last year, new models and methods for pretraining and transfer learning have driven striking performance improvements across a range of language understanding tasks. The GLUE benchmark, introduced a little over one year ago, offers a single-number metric that summarizes progress on a diverse set of such tasks, but performance on the benchmark has recently surpassed the level of non-expert humans, suggesting limited headroom for further research. In this paper we present SuperGLUE, a new benchmark styled after GLUE with a new set of more difficult language understanding tasks, a software toolkit, and a public leaderboard. SuperGLUE is available at super.gluebenchmark.com.

We present QuAC, a dataset for Question Answering in Context that contains 14K information-seeking QA dialogs (100K questions in total). The dialogs involve two crowd workers: (1) a student who poses a sequence of freeform questions to learn as much as possible about a hidden Wikipedia text, and (2) a teacher who answers the questions by providing short excerpts from the text. QuAC introduces challenges not found in existing machine comprehension datasets: its questions are often more open-ended, unanswerable, or only meaningful within the dialog context, as we show in a detailed qualitative evaluation. We also report results for a number of reference models, including a recently state-ofthe-art reading comprehension architecture extended to model dialog context. Our best model underperforms humans by 20 F1, suggesting that there is significant room for future work on this data. Dataset, baseline, and leaderboard available at http://quac.ai.

自Bert（Devlin等，2018）以来，学习上下文化的单词嵌入一直是NLP中的事实上的标准。然而，学习上下文化短语嵌入的进展受到缺乏人类通知的语句基准基准的阻碍。为了填补这一空白，我们提出了PIC- 〜28K名词短语的数据集伴随着它们的上下文Wikipedia页面，以及一套三个任务，这些任务增加了评估短语嵌入质量的难度。我们发现，在我们的数据集中进行的培训提高了排名模型的准确性，并明显地将问题答案（QA）模型推向了近人类的准确性，而在语义搜索上，鉴于询问短语和段落，在语义搜索上是95％的精确匹配（EM）。有趣的是，我们发现这种令人印象深刻的性能的证据是因为质量检查模型学会了更好地捕获短语的共同含义，而不管其实际背景如何。也就是说，在我们的短语中歧义歧义（PSD）任务上，SOTA模型的精度大大下降（60％EM），在两个不同情况下未能区分相同短语的两种不同感觉。在我们的3任任务基准测试中的进一步结果表明，学习上下文化的短语嵌入仍然是一个有趣的开放挑战。

Powerful generative models have led to recent progress in question generation (QG). However, it is difficult to measure advances in QG research since there are no standardized resources that allow a uniform comparison among approaches. In this paper, we introduce QG-Bench, a multilingual and multidomain benchmark for QG that unifies existing question answering datasets by converting them to a standard QG setting. It includes general-purpose datasets such as SQuAD for English, datasets from ten domains and two styles, as well as datasets in eight different languages. Using QG-Bench as a reference, we perform an extensive analysis of the capabilities of language models for the task. First, we propose robust QG baselines based on fine-tuning generative language models. Then, we complement automatic evaluation based on standard metrics with an extensive manual evaluation, which in turn sheds light on the difficulty of evaluating QG models. Finally, we analyse both the domain adaptability of these models as well as the effectiveness of multilingual models in languages other than English. QG-Bench is released along with the fine-tuned models presented in the paper https://github.com/asahi417/lm-question-generation, which are also available as a demo https://autoqg.net/.

As large language models (LLMs) grow larger and more sophisticated, assessing their "reasoning" capabilities in natural language grows more challenging. Recent question answering (QA) benchmarks that attempt to assess reasoning are often limited by a narrow scope of covered situations and subject matters. We introduce WikiWhy, a QA dataset built around a novel auxiliary task: explaining why an answer is true in natural language. WikiWhy contains over 9,000 "why" question-answer-rationale triples, grounded on Wikipedia facts across a diverse set of topics. Each rationale is a set of supporting statements connecting the question to the answer. WikiWhy serves as a benchmark for the reasoning capabilities of LLMs because it demands rigorous explicit rationales for each answer to demonstrate the acquisition of implicit commonsense knowledge, which is unlikely to be easily memorized. GPT-3 baselines achieve only 38.7% human-evaluated correctness in the end-to-end answer & explain condition, leaving significant room for future improvements.